• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Johnson Trial Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dogbark said:
No it doesn't.

The club referred to receiving documents and passing them on immediately. You either believe that or you don't. If you don't then any further statement from them is pointless anyway.
Click to expand...
The documents could have been delivered to the club in a sealed package for the attention of Johnsons legal team and passed to him by Ms Byrne.
Does anyone know where this meeting took place, could have been at SoL or AoL and hence the reason docs in the clubs possession. Maybe Ms Byrne handed them over and left them to it and was only at meeting or in their company for a little while.
Just a thought like.
 
The Resource said:
It's taking all of the focus off today's game. Surely less pressure can only be a good thing for the players?
Click to expand...

Tbh we're so use to this position that even if our players started a giant royal rumble with the southampton players at kick off it wouldnt change our focus on things!

My money would be on mvila to flatten all of them except wanyama. Wouldnt mess with him... maybe send catts after him
 
I wouldn't fall off my chair if I heard that a national tabloid newspaper was actually behind the burglaries, paying some scrote to see what photos or other paraphernalia they can dredge up while turning a blind eye to owt else the light-fingered twonk might chance to purloin.
 
geordiedean said:
His initial is an A really?

That is his actual name a username on a forum is created and can be changed at any point

Your comparisons there are daft really
Click to expand...

His second name is Johnson. Should everyone with that second name now change it? FFS you're going on like he's called Hitler.

Anyway you're the two faced bellend who was slagging us off on a Mag forum not too long ago while licking arse on here. Your opinion is worthless.
 
Reiver said:
And here is is avoiding the question as always, so I'll post it again ..... and, no, I'm not trying to tell 'everybody' because, despite what you seem to believe, you don't speak for the board.

In all the years I've posted I've never told any Sunderland people they shouldn't post on here, fact.

You've made your accusation so, instead of going off on tangents, back it up like a man .......

redandwhiterob said: ↑

"I'm not the one whose telling people they shouldn't be posting a opinion on a public forum ffs"

BTW you should say who's and an opinion.
Click to expand...

Oh mam fuvk off. You're a expert at shouting and shouting and shouting until people get sick of replying and you are doing the same he. @haway posted a excellent post yesterday that showed you for the hypocrite you are and you just blatantly ignored it and went back onto shouting loudly until people get sick and stop replying like you are doing now

If it makes you feel better you win everything ffs. Like dealing with a bairn
 
geordiedean said:
I was referring to that it was 1 moment not pre meditated over nearly 3 months. That in no means is condoning Hughes grossly horrific crime to which he was punished and served his time

The difference is Hughes didn't set out to crash his car and kill someone. Johnson set out to groom lure and violate this girl
Click to expand...

He drank an obscene amount knowing he was going to get behind the wheel of a potential killing machine. Is that not premeditated? He then fucked off and left the bloke to die.
You actually think that is a lesser crime?
 
Who'd have thought it, Newcastle United's preferred media partner putting the boot right in to try and destabilise the club at a time when both clubs are going head to head in a desperate relegation fight.
 
Mackem00 said:
Top trumps mate. Whose worse? Jimmy Saville or Harold Shipman.

When you were 15 and I had Natalie Umbruglia ready to sit on your lap or Vinnie Jones ready to make you half blind. What would you choose?
Click to expand...

Wow that just tops the lot.....unbelievable

And I was a bit older than 15 when Natalie imbruglia was around pal
 
GK said:
It explains all that needs to be explained. The rest is just people being nosey.
Click to expand...

It's people wanting to know why everyone and their dog is alleging that people at the club had at least some reason to think he had been up to no good, and why the club haven't refuted that.
 
toosb said:
"As it stands, SAFC are admitting to supporting a child-sex offender in his bid to beat the justice system, knowing he was guilty."

Hopefully SAFC will pass that on to their lawyers
Click to expand...
Another civil court case? We'll have our own parking space soon. :lol:

I doubt the club will sue anyone.
 
Icarebecauseyoudo said:
Well they have covered it as every communication has said they thought he was pleading not guilty

Just nobody seems to believe it
Click to expand...
They haven't covered it!

They have been very clever in their wording.

Otherwise why not say "Yes we did" "No we definitely had no information whatsoever that could possibly lead us to believe" or "no one had any idea of what the evidence could have been to warrant a charge of grooming"

SAFC will have been able to get a fair idea of the evidence facing the defendant. After all our Chairperson is a criminal lawyer.

The amount of people who are clinging onto this gutless club are amazing!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top