• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Adam Johnson appeal

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Fish said:
Look worse? He groomed then fingered a child. I don't think some bloke on the internet saying that Footballers have more sway, over more kids, than teachers do is really going to make him look worse, do you? :lol:
Click to expand...

No but most would say of the two it's teachers who are in the biggest position of trust. It's a daft thing to score points on but found it funny you'd look to make him the worse of the two.

Sms55441 said:
The disproportionate sentences for similar crimes is confusing tbh, however i guess the real question/debate is- which sentences is more appropriate 2 years or 6? I have to say imo johnsons sentence is fair whilst the teachers one is too lenient
Click to expand...

I'd probably agree tbh.
 

dangermows said:
No but most would say of the two it's teachers who are in the biggest position of trust. It's a daft thing to score points on but found it funny you'd look to make him the worse of the two.



I'd probably agree tbh.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to score points, if you read my posts you'll know that's not my style. I put professional footballers in the same bracket at tv presenters, popstars and the like. They say jump, kids are gonna ask "How high?". Teachers are in a position of trust, and can abuse that, but honestly, you know fine well that kids are desperate to impress famous people, where as most kids couldn't give a shit about their teacher. :lol:

I'm genuinely not trying to "score points", I just find it baffling when people defend/downplay/excuse/whatabout a convicted sex offender like Adam Johnson.
 
The Fish said:
I'm not trying to score points, if you read my posts you'll know that's not my style. I put professional footballers in the same bracket at tv presenters, popstars and the like. They say jump, kids are gonna ask "How high?". Teachers are in a position of trust, and can abuse that, but honestly, you know fine well that kids are desperate to impress famous people, where as most kids couldn't give a shit about their teacher. :lol:

I'm genuinely not trying to "score points", I just find it baffling when people defend/downplay/excuse/whatabout a convicted sex offender like Adam Johnson.
Click to expand...

The facts speak for themselves, more teachers do it than footballers, that we know of any way. And that's because teachers spend more time with kids than their own parents do.

The only time it's "down played" is when people use terms like paedophile and compare this to cases like Savile and Harris. It's done by people looking to sensationalise as no one can be that thick.

Right, it's been done to death now so I shall let the rest crack on.
 
Last edited:
excuse me while I open this can of worms.

What about priests? Surely their sexual abuse (normally against young boys) is the worst of the worst. Personally I think that sexual abuse of any kind deserves the maximum time in prison.
 
dangermows said:
The facts speak for themselves, more teachers do it than footballers, thst we know of any way. And that's because teachers spend more time with kids than their own parents do.
Click to expand...
So what? More priests do it than Popstars, that doesn't diminish the fact individual popstars can have more influence over more kids than individual priests do.

If Beiber turned up at a random 13yr old girls house he could probably have sex with, a priest couldn/'t.
 
dangermows said:
:cool:

And with that, his work was done.
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong but from what I've read, you've

1. Claimed Adam Johnson wasn't to blame for abusing a child - it was his victim and her parents at fault.

2. Confirmed that you can understand men who are attracted to children.

3. Claimed Johnson's crime was unfairly sensationalised

That correct?

And still you're posting on here as if these views are all a big laugh.
 
8 JLB said:
Correct me if I'm wrong but from what I've read, you've

1. Claimed Adam Johnson wasn't to blame for abusing a child - it was his victim and her parents at fault.

2. Confirmed that you can understand men who are attracted to children.

3. Claimed Johnson's crime was unfairly sensationalised

That correct?

And still you're posting on here as if these views are all a big laugh.
Click to expand...

No marra, wrong again, on all fronts. Your weird stalking, lies and obsession continues. Looking forward to your next alter ego.
 
dangermows said:
No marra, wrong again, on all fronts. Your weird stalking, lies and obsession continues. Looking forward to your next alter ego.
Click to expand...
I'm not stalking you "marra".

I simply provided a summary of your posts on this thread.

Shall I bump them to remind you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top