You can be slightly better than poor players yet still not good enough you know
So we should just stick with the players that are worse because the one’s that are better aren’t good enough?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can be slightly better than poor players yet still not good enough you know
The point surely is though you have to pick two openers in a cricket match?You can be slightly better than poor players yet still not good enough you know
Where did I say stick with lees or CrawleySo we should just stick with the players that are worse because the one’s that are better aren’t good enough?
Can you not have players who are better than the current options but still not be good enough for the futureThe point surely is though you have to pick two openers in a cricket match?
So it’s not a question of whether you good enough, it’s surely a question of whether you better then other options?
It’s the same in football you might have goalkeepers who you think are not good enough, but you still have to pick one! so you pick who you consider the best.
Oh, go on thenand can we mention Boycott![]()
Hope he gets his Dentury first before he knicks offCrawley to last 7 balls this morning, adding 4 to his overnight score
There's the four...Hope he gets his Dentury first before he knicks off
There’s another edgef***ing hell, nearly
There's the four...
The one in the second over, not so much!That knick in the first over was well controlled (commentators sometimes overlook that).
Yes, simple as. Well done, Crawley.Great ball