• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

‘Glasgow Rangers’.


Things have escalated, the'Union Bears' have issued a statement, or got someone to write it for them at least. They've right got it in for the Star Trek gadgee

Logon or register to see this image

I love their closing paragraph, I'm reckoning they've lined up a magician and a pixelated TIFO

"A series of protest actions have already been planned, beginning with Saturday's match. Unless changes are made before then, these actions will be made known to the wider support."

This is their normal look, which is pure ragin', so I'm not sure where they can go on the angry face scale

Logon or register to see this image
 
chunkyshanhawk53 said:
“The standards this club was built on”?

One league title in their entire history
Click to expand...

This logic is weird. How many clubs are owned by the same corporate vehicle as when they were formed? Are they all different clubs from when they were formed, if not?

ght say, "Yeah but they were not dissolved due to debt." But that is not a relevant matter. Fact is that clubs have had assets transferred between companies and older companies dissolved, like Rangers.

Besides Leeds, Boro, Wolves had previous companies dissolved, Wolves twice. Are they a club which is only 39yrs old?
 
Montysavestheday said:
This logic is weird. How many clubs are owned by the same corporate vehicle as when they were formed? Are they all different clubs from when they were formed, if not?

ght say, "Yeah but they were not dissolved due to debt." But that is not a relevant matter. Fact is that clubs have had assets transferred between companies and older companies dissolved, like Rangers.

Besides Leeds, Boro, Wolves had previous companies dissolved, Wolves twice. Are they a club which is only 39yrs old?
Click to expand...

Its complete nonsense but let the children get their giggles on the Internet.
banburysafc said:
They're like those Palace gonks who dress in black, are soft as shite and have some wazzock with a megaphone. Can see why at least one of our resident rentaclub gobshites was trying to start a similar thing here.
Click to expand...

😂😂😂

Not a clue.
 
Last edited:
Montysavestheday said:
This logic is weird. How many clubs are owned by the same corporate vehicle as when they were formed? Are they all different clubs from when they were formed, if not?

ght say, "Yeah but they were not dissolved due to debt." But that is not a relevant matter. Fact is that clubs have had assets transferred between companies and older companies dissolved, like Rangers.

Besides Leeds, Boro, Wolves had previous companies dissolved, Wolves twice. Are they a club which is only 39yrs old?
Click to expand...
You’re not usually on the football board mate, you ok?
 
Rangers have a turnouver of 88m the next closest rival Hearts have an annual turnover of 20m
Got to say there's something fishy going on with the ownership
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top