I think everyone has been pleasantly surprised by Anderson, he has bowled very well with little luck
Finn needs a rest I think, time for Shazad or Tremlett?
Finn needs a rest I think, time for Shazad or Tremlett?
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
James Anderson Watch in Australia
- Thread starter essex boy
- Start date
- Status
SteveB
Striker
Bring them both in and drop two of the batsmen we don't seem to need at the moment
rentaghost
Striker
On a pitch where England have scored two double centuries and two 150s in the last 2 innings scoring around 1200 runs in total Jimmy took 4/51 in bowling the opposition out for 250 or so and being a huge influence in winning the game. Not bad and not even in England in May.
The Breen Machine
Striker
After EB's doubts over Jimmy's ability to LEAD the attack, I think the last 2 tests have shown he is not only an ever improving and versitile performer, he's most certainly the spearhead of a fine attack and leading from the front.
first innings of the match its always a green top in adelaide, everyone knows that
I think Finn is benefitting from not being Anderson, Broad or Swann. They relax a touch and get out being daft. Finn not in the same category, nothing menacing about him.
rentaghost
Striker
3/61 today. Not at his best I thought but a decent enough days work.
dangermows
Striker
decent enough when not at his best. loved it when johnson pitched in with "whats the matter, cant get any wickets". next ball, gone!
doesnt matter tho cos its only the wickets he takes outside of australia, when in australia, that count.
lost the test on the first day, wasnt a 260 wicket first up.
grass left on the wicket, was ideal for bowling. poor effort
Steak Pie
Striker
Wa-hay!!!
After tea, Anderson had Siddle caught at slip by Collingwood for his 200th Test wicket, becoming the second fastest Englishman after Ian Botham to reach the landmark.
The Ashes 2010: This is Australia's worst side for 30 years
Australian cricket is in a dark place right now. Whereas England's preparations so far have been excellent, Australia look like a team in disarray. Crucially for England everyone is fit and ready to play.
This was not the case on either of the past two Ashes tours. In 2002-03 Darren Gough, Steve Harmison and Andrew Flintoff were all struggling. And in 2006‑07 we had injuries to Michael Vaughan, Ashley Giles and Marcus Trescothick. Not this time. This means that the management knows exactly what their best XI is. So the team has had a chance to settle down and play well in their two warm-up matches.
Compare that to Australia's build-up. On the two Ashes tours I managed the Australian pundits used to accuse us of using injuries as excuses. Now all the noise about who is and who is not fit is coming from their side. Injury bulletins are popping up from left, right and centre. Michael Clarke has a back problem, Simon Katich has had trouble with his thumb and Doug Bollinger has been struggling with a stomach muscle strain. The selectors say these niggles explain why they included 17 men in their squad for the first Test but picking so many players just shows the uncertainty in their thinking.
The team have won only one of their past eight matches, so they have no momentum. That bad run also means there must be doubts about Ricky Ponting's captaincy. But whereas before they had a natural successor lined up in Clarke, right, now there are serious questions being asked about whether he deserves to be the heir apparent. Mike Hussey has been told that his place is under threat from the two young batsmen in the squad, Usman Khawaja and Callum Ferguson. But picking either of those two would mean throwing a debutant in for the first Ashes Test. Australia also have a problem with their spinner, Nathan Hauritz. Half the country seems to want him in the team, the other half wants him out. And again, the guy they have brought in to give him competition has never played a Test. On top of all that, they have just sacked one of their selectors, Merv Hughes.
Every signal the Australians are sending out speaks of the confusion in their camp and the breakdown in their planning for this series. It all makes you wonder exactly where Australian cricket is at the moment. You have to go back more than 30 years, to the era when Kerry Packer had tempted away the best players to World Series Cricket, to find the last time the team were in such a muddled state. And at least back then it was obvious that they still had some talented players in reserve. At the moment you would struggle to know if that was true of this team, simply because none of the young players has been capped yet.
A good way to judge the health of the Australian team is this: Between 2000 and 2007, every single one of their players would have been snapped up by the English county sides. Not only that, they had about 10 players who could not even get in the team who would have been picked up as well. Look at Australia now and there are not many players in the team that the counties would be scrambling over each other to sign up for a season, let alone 10 more from outside the squad.
So there is no doubt in my mind that England start this series as favourites. Of course they have to be careful, Australia are a side that come out fighting when they find themselves in sticky situations. But the biggest worry I have about England is how well they will cope with being in such a strong position. It is not a situation they have been in very often, and in recent years they have always been happier being the underdogs. The risk is that when you are the favourite you just start to get a little cocky, your work ethic slips and you stop practising with the necessary intensity. When England are favourites they seem to falter. They are not wanting for anything at the moment, so if they do not perform they are going to start questioning themselves and their ability to live up to that favourites tag.
This is where Andrew Strauss's influence will be key. It is great for England that he started the tour so well, with two centuries in two matches. Otherwise the Australians would have been quick to pile more pressure on him by picking him apart in the press. Their bowlers will still be looking to come hard at him when the first Test starts, but he is a tough nut. And he will have learned a lot from the last tour in 2006‑07, when the most successful English players were the ones who were the most aggressive in the field.
Kevin Pietersen and Paul Collingwood were England's leading run scorers, and they both took a ruthless approach to the opposition. Strauss had a similar mindset, but he suffered a series of poor umpiring decisions which stopped him going on to make big scores. He will have to set a hard, unyielding tone for the team in Australia this time if England are going to take advantage of the home side's poor preparations.
wow, I didnt know Jimmy had taken all of his 200 wickets in the current series
took the other 190 against Bangaldesh
thanks for clarifying
Australia are/were of shorn of confidence. This side is pretty woeful. There best batsman cant get a run for love nor money, they have no spinner above club standard, the media are on their backs.
What do England do, go 1-0 up then play abysmal cricket from ball one of the third test.
Apart from Tremlett and Bell, the other 9 have been CRAP.
We will never be number one in the world while such ordinary performances are tolerated. Show no mercy
Mainze
Striker
I'm glad we have a solid coach in Flower, and not a knee jerker. He will keep faith with the team as will the selectors and Captain, and rightly so.
Regardless of how the media perceived the Austalian team, it was never going to be an easy series to win. As it turns out it may be a classic, which is why we all watch test cricket, is it not ?
- Status
