• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread


One problem for them is that they have played it down (abysmally) as a very minor problem without consequence for the victim clubs. Sacking the manager does not fit that narrative, especially as they must be bricking it that more evidence comes to light.
 
What a shit statement. Rotten club
That just stinks.

Any sympathy or goodwill they may have got from this process is gone with a prickly and awkward statement like that.

Edit: the only way out of this to preserves any face at all is surely to sack the manager and start clean next season. I'm actually shocked he's not gone yet.
 
Last edited:
One problem for them is that they have played it down (abysmally) as a very minor problem without consequence for the victim clubs. Sacking the manager does not fit that narrative, especially as they must be bricking it that more evidence comes to light.
I really hope the IDC offered Southampton a full disclosure deal, so everything on the table, now. Owt else comes to light and you'll be in League one.
 
Theres something clearly wrong with the ownership at Southampton.

Those guilty should have been sacked by now but it would appear that they want to keep them on, presumably because they think they can get then up next season.
Opposition fans at away grounds next season will not seem like the 12th man, more like 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th.

Can't wait to see a televised away match involving them.
 
Such a bitter statement. Get fucked

"We accept that the club breached the relevant regulations and we recognise that the disciplinary bodies were entitled to conclude that proof of sporting advantage was not necessary in order to establish a serious offence.

"Despite this, we are happy with the way in which we admitted the charges and offered our full cooperation and honesty once the formal EFL investigation process had started."

"What is harder to accept is that similar scrutiny does not appear to have been applied to the composition of the disciplinary panel itself, given the apparent historic and indirect connections of two panel members to Middlesbrough.
While those connections do not by themselves prove bias, they plainly raise legitimate questions about consistency, perception and the standards of independence expected in proceedings of this magnitude.

"This case has ultimately been decided on the basis that breach and attempted breach were enough, regardless of whether any sporting benefit was actually obtained. In fact, at no stage was there any finding that the club actually obtained any sporting advantage as a result of the conduct in question. That is a severe interpretation but one the disciplinary authorities were entitled to adopt under the rules as written.

"The club is also concerned by the weight placed on assertions that junior staff were pressurised into involvement, when some of the most serious allegations appear not to have been supported by direct evidence.
 
Last edited:
Opposition fans at away grounds next season will not seem like the 12th man, more like 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th.

Can't wait to see a televised away match involving them.
The opposition DJs should be playing spy themed songs before the game. James Bond theme tunes, I Am A Spy In The House Of Love, I Spy For The FBI etc etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfg
Back
Top