• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

University student stabbed

Can't believe people are defending the Police here, absolutely disgusting
Who’s defending the police . They’ve fucked up and some kid has died because of it . Posters are just trying to understand and possibly explain how they got it wrong .
Initial crime scenes after fights / domestics or whatever can be totally confusing. It happens all the time where in the first instance the police get it wrong . That’s why there is an investigation and even after that investigation, the police / CPS / jury can get it wrong .
 

The leftwaffe have arrived and the morality bombs are being dropped.
Any tragedy will do.
You know what , I’m normally the one on the politics section getting called racist or Nazi for some pretty middle ground view I have . I personally think they can be nuts but then you have yourself who does the same from the other side and I have just just hold my hands up and say “Fuck it , the worlds gone mad”
 
Can't believe people are defending the Police here, absolutely disgusting

no one is defending the police insofar as that no one is saying that they are without fault

everyone has agreed, given the available public evidence, that they fucked up

just some people want to attribute that fuck up to them being reverse racists. and some people want to attribute that fuck up to them entering a highly complex and moving target of a crime scene and making the wrong critical judgement calls in the heat of the moment.

hopefully the investigation gets to the bottom of it
 
You know what , I’m normally the one on the politics section getting called racist or Nazi for some pretty middle ground view I have . I personally think they can be nuts but then you have yourself who does the same from the other side and I have just just hold my hands up and say “Fuck it , the worlds gone mad”
No worries mate. Im not gonna argue.
 
He had a cut to his jaw as reported not a stab wound
It was caused by a stab from a knife. How is that not a stab wound? It was a visible injury which should have made the police realise that something had happened to him. They chose not to believe him though.
What's the reason then?
It's because the murderer said he'd been racially slurred and had his turban knocked off. They believed those lies over a dying boy who said he'd been stabbed. " I don't think you have mate". Shocking doesn't cover it.
 
Last edited:
It was caused by a stab from a knife. How is that not a stab wound? It was a visible injury which should have made the police realise that something had happened to him. They chose not to believe him though.
Its will create a cut/laceration to the surface which normally would produce a lot of blood however in this circumstance it would be unlikely to produce a lot of blood (or stop suddenly) given the main injury was internal and the body would have immediately entered haemorrhagic shock which would cause drastic vasoconstriction and reduce blood flow to capillaries and smaller blood vessels (i.e. facial extremities) and result in internal pooling instead
 
We’ve all established that the police have fucked up by not initially checking the young lad’s injuries but what I’m trying to show is that scenes are not always as they first appear .Who can forget this twat below . Now if you turned up as a copper to this , who would you initially think was the victim and who was the aggressor ??

You must be logged on to see media items
 
Last edited:
Its will create a cut/laceration to the surface which normally would produce a lot of blood however in this circumstance it would be unlikely to produce a lot of blood (or stop suddenly) given the main injury was internal and the body would have immediately entered haemorrhagic shock which would cause drastic vasoconstriction and reduce blood flow to capillaries and smaller blood vessels (i.e. facial extremities) and result in internal pooling instead
That's really quite comical. So you're trying to say there would be no blood on his face because it will have all been internal? A stab to the face will produse blood. There's nothing else to say really.
I can't believe that anybody is trying to excuse what happened here. Other than arguing for the sake of it and trying to be soooo clever. It's actually sickening to read.
 
That's really quite comical. So you're trying to say there would be no blood on his face because it will have all been internal? A stab to the face will produse blood. There's nothing else to say really.
I can't believe that anybody is trying to excuse what happened here. Other than arguing for the sake of it and trying to be soooo clever. It's actually sickening to read.
Its not comical at all. If you have major internal bleeds there is immediate vasoconstriction which reduces blood flow and subsequently will not produce as you think some massive spurting wound.

I am not be sooo clever, I am merely pointing out you haven't a clue what you are talking about. Maybe the pathologist didn't either? What do you reckon

ps I am not excusing anything just pointing out your very basic argument based on your two-tier, woke, anti establishment predetermined bias
 
Last edited:
That's really quite comical. So you're trying to say there would be no blood on his face because it will have all been internal? A stab to the face will produse blood. There's nothing else to say really.
I can't believe that anybody is trying to excuse what happened here. Other than arguing for the sake of it and trying to be soooo clever. It's actually sickening to read.
Standard though.
 
Its not comical at all. If you have major internal bleeds there is immediate vasoconstriction which reduces blood flow and subsequently will not produce as you think some massive spurting wound.

I am not be sooo clever, I am merely pointing out you haven't a clue what you are talking about. Maybe the pathologist didn't either? What do you reckon

ps I am not excusing anything just pointing out your very basic argument based on your two-tier, woke, anti establishment predetermined bias
Post links to where it says there was no blood on his face from this invisible stab wound.
 
Back
Top