• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Value For Money table

One of the most pointless tables I’ve witnessed
Not even sure it makes sense. Surely teams arent spending 350-400 million on wages?

Bournemouth cannot be bringing in £350million so does that mean they are fucked with having to deal with the 70% cost thing in europa league?
 

I get what your saying but your money in exceeds your money out there is no cost that season
That’s not what it’s about though. It’s about the cost of your squad vs performance rather than whether you make a profit.

Look at it another way, most of the teams in that list have to make big sales every year because their costs are so high
Not even sure it makes sense. Surely teams arent spending 350-400 million on wages?

Bournemouth cannot be bringing in £350million so does that mean they are fucked with having to deal with the 70% cost thing in europa league?
Yes and yes
 
They’ve uplifted it based on available data (agents fees) and assumptions

It’s in the order of who outperformed/underperformed expectations the most

But where's the columns showing the points attained and the difference between that and the expected points?
 
Back
Top