• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread

Horley Chorley said:
Considering, Southampton initially sold their entire allocation of Wembley tickets, which were then cancelled, and those tickets have already gone back on sale today, via Boro's online ticketing site, it would be bloody farcical, if Southampton were to be reinstated after their appeal is heard, which would then mean those Boro tickets being cancelled, and given back to Southampton. 🫣

Surely, it's not gonna happen . . . is it ? 🤔
Click to expand...
Would be the highest attended game in history
 

I've got an opinion on this that I haven't heard anyone articulate yet.

If you're having it away and youre two consenting adults you both perform to the best of your ability.

If however one party has asked their mate to spy on you through the window that's a breach of decency.

If however you know they've done this before, how are you supposed to keep your head in the game...? 😂😂😂

Essentially I think it's cheating. Haha
 
tynevalleyblackcat said:
They admitted to Ipswich and Oxford as they lost both and with Ipswich going up and Oxford going down, those games did not have an adverse impact on the table.

If anyone thinks they only did those three then I have some magic beans to sell them.
Click to expand...
Think you have totally missed the point of my post. The bloke mentioned Oxford twice….
 
keithmoon66 said:
I've got an opinion on this that I haven't heard anyone articulate yet.

If you're having it away and youre two consenting adults you both perform to the best of your ability.

If however one party has asked their mate to spy on you through the window that's a breach of decency.

If however you know they've done this before, how are you supposed to keep your head in the game...? 😂😂😂

Essentially I think it's cheating. Haha
Click to expand...
Yes, ok.
 
Maravilla said:
Boro had enough chances to have put the tie to bed by half-time of the first leg mind. Regardless of what else happened in the buildup, they only have themselves to blame for not winning that one.
Click to expand...

The game result is essentially irrelevant.

Even if they'd lost they could still have been charged with impropriety (whatever the rules state) essentially cheating.

Still a points deduction possibly for next season?
 
They should get 1 point deducted for each game they spied upon, it's obvious they did most, if not all, games this season. Get their staff in and offer them immunity from bans if they tell the truth about the full extent of it.

Europe might not have this sense of fairplay and good sportsmanship, but they are sacred to the Britons, along with orderly queuing and tikka masala.
 
keithmoon66 said:
I've got an opinion on this that I haven't heard anyone articulate yet.

If you're having it away and youre two consenting adults you both perform to the best of your ability.

If however one party has asked their mate to spy on you through the window that's a breach of decency.

If however you know they've done this before, how are you supposed to keep your head in the game...? 😂😂😂

Essentially I think it's cheating. Haha
Click to expand...
I really hope this is how Boro phrased it in there written submission to the independent commission.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top