Hugh Gains
Striker
You must be logged on to see media items
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
University student stabbed
- Thread starter Hugh Gains
- Start date
John Steed
Striker
What missing facts do you think could explain why the police handcuffed a teenager who was actually in the process of dying? He'd been stabbed multiple times with visible wounds. When he told the cop he'd been stabbed back came "I don't think you have mate".
Or do you think none of this happened and that's why you're dubious? They didn't actually cuff a dying teenager?
League Wan
Winger
Abother tragic loss of life.
In the UK Sikhs are legally permitted to carry a Kirpan knife in public as it is protected under religious exemption laws.
Ridiculous law, absolutely no reason to carry a knife. Why is the UK soft with shite like this?
In the UK Sikhs are legally permitted to carry a Kirpan knife in public as it is protected under religious exemption laws.
Ridiculous law, absolutely no reason to carry a knife. Why is the UK soft with shite like this?
citybythesea
Striker
Tragic story, Shows the devastating consequences of knife crime and also how racism can elicit violence in society
RIP to the victim
RIP to the victim
Apache Inbound
Winger
errant
Striker
Logon or register to see this image
King Durin
Central Defender
What does that have to do with police arresting somebody who's at that brink of death after being stabbed multiple times?
Wild Card
Striker
Put the article into copilot so I didn't have to gige the daily mail any clicks. For those that dont want to either...
Just the alleged facts
A 23‑year‑old Sikh man, Vickrum Digwa, is on trial for the fatal stabbing of 18‑year‑old student Henry Nowak in Southampton in December 2025.
- Prosecutors say Digwa used a large knife and also had a kirpan (a Sikh ceremonial blade).
- Digwa claims self‑defence, alleging Nowak racially abused him and knocked off his turban.
- Video evidence exists from the victim’s phone showing the encounter.
- Digwa’s mother is also charged with assisting an offender by removing the weapon.
- Several outlets report the police handcuffed the dying victim after the attacker claimed racism — a detail that has caused public outrage.
What’s Daily Mail‑ified about it
The Mail takes a real case and then:
- Leads with ethnicity and religion in a way designed to provoke culture‑war engagement.
- Frames the kirpan as the central weapon even though reporting shows a much larger knife was also involved.
- Presents allegations as if they’re established fact, even though the trial
is ongoing.
Just the alleged facts
A 23‑year‑old Sikh man, Vickrum Digwa, is on trial for the fatal stabbing of 18‑year‑old student Henry Nowak in Southampton in December 2025.
- Prosecutors say Digwa used a large knife and also had a kirpan (a Sikh ceremonial blade).
- Digwa claims self‑defence, alleging Nowak racially abused him and knocked off his turban.
- Video evidence exists from the victim’s phone showing the encounter.
- Digwa’s mother is also charged with assisting an offender by removing the weapon.
- Several outlets report the police handcuffed the dying victim after the attacker claimed racism — a detail that has caused public outrage.
What’s Daily Mail‑ified about itThe Mail takes a real case and then:
- Leads with ethnicity and religion in a way designed to provoke culture‑war engagement.
- Frames the kirpan as the central weapon even though reporting shows a much larger knife was also involved.
- Presents allegations as if they’re established fact, even though the trial
is ongoing.
bomber
Striker
Id of started a thread but it wadnt make 2 pages on the SMB.Easier just to put it in one of the ongoing violence threads that are popular.
johnlights
Central Defender
Anyone know when the protests are planned?
Surely this is worthy of the George Floyd outrage?
Surely this is worthy of the George Floyd outrage?
Stella Spark
Central Defender
We don't know of any racism was involved. The stabber claimed there was when the police came, but he also claimed the kid hadn't been stabbed.
johnlights
Central Defender
It absolutely sums up that racism, proven or not, is worse than anything else. any crime. This allows crimes to go unpunished. See Manchester Arena. The fear of racial accusations saw those people killed.
Wild Card
Striker
Video evidence exists as the victim was recording it prior to the assault. Presumably this will be cleared up pretty quickly in court.
Although I believe that the allegations are only allegations at this stage.
Last edited:
John Steed
Striker
Claims of racism. Probably made up and used as damage limitation after a violent attack, in this case.
johnlights
Central Defender
He was overheard, apparently, shouting that he is '' a bad man''...
Stella Spark
Central Defender
The Mail reports that he already had a knife that classed as a kirpan, suggesting there was no religious excuse to be carrying the large knife. Also mentions a large amount of weapons in his home.Put the article into copilot so I didn't have to gige the daily mail any clicks. For those that dont want to either...
Just the alleged facts
A 23‑year‑old Sikh man, Vickrum Digwa, is on trial for the fatal stabbing of 18‑year‑old student Henry Nowak in Southampton in December 2025.
- Prosecutors say Digwa used a large knife and also had a kirpan (a Sikh ceremonial blade).
- Digwa claims self‑defence, alleging Nowak racially abused him and knocked off his turban.
- Video evidence exists from the victim’s phone showing the encounter.
- Digwa’s mother is also charged with assisting an offender by removing the weapon.
- Several outlets report the police handcuffed the dying victim after the attacker claimed racism — a detail that has caused public outrage.
The Mail takes a real case and then:
- Leads with ethnicity and religion in a way designed to provoke culture‑war engagement.
- Frames the kirpan as the central weapon even though reporting shows a much larger knife was also involved.
- Presents allegations as if they’re established fact, even though the trial
is ongoing.
Mail reports what the lawyers are saying, both sides.
In what way does it lead with race and ethnicity? The murderer stabbed someone to death, and the police cuffed the dying victim when the perpetrator told them he hadn't been stabbed and was being racist.
Hate the mail so much your trying to play down this wrong doing. That's cultire war right there
The video just shows him calling him a bad man etc. then cuts out?
Last edited:
John Steed
Striker
*My wife's called me worse.
If that's a motive for killing someone I hope the jury don't fall for it.*She hasn't actually, she's great.
chrismisterx
Striker
Lets remove religion from the equation, because it has no bearing on this case, the small fake religious knife wasn't used.
I say this as someone is no fan of religion.
2 things jump out straight away with how this was handled.
Why did the police believe one person over the other and why wasn't the claims that he couldnt breathe and he had been stabbed not take more seriously?
The crime is straight forward, one tooled up young lad has murdered another, no words justify stabbing someone, if in fact any words were said. "bad man" doesnt really count.
The mothers crime is also straight forward.
The issue is how the police dealt with this, the law should be colour blind, police shouldnt just take a side because of skin colour, also a crime should be investigated at the scene, by listening to both parties, it would have taken seconds to see one lad was stabbed and could be dying.
this is 100% a police issue, something is broken to believe one side over the other without witnesses to the point you believe him when he said the guy hadn't been stabbed.
The officers have to be held to account and made to explain there actions, because there failure to act could have led to a life that could have been saved being lost.
Racism should not be a valid defence either, if the lad had made racist comments, take his picture, video him and report it to the police, dont take the law in to your own hands and become judge, jury and executioner, just want to add there is no proof racist comments were made, maybe its just been said to justify his actions, since they hid the weapon, I think its likely just an excuse.
I say this as someone is no fan of religion.
2 things jump out straight away with how this was handled.
Why did the police believe one person over the other and why wasn't the claims that he couldnt breathe and he had been stabbed not take more seriously?
The crime is straight forward, one tooled up young lad has murdered another, no words justify stabbing someone, if in fact any words were said. "bad man" doesnt really count.
The mothers crime is also straight forward.
The issue is how the police dealt with this, the law should be colour blind, police shouldnt just take a side because of skin colour, also a crime should be investigated at the scene, by listening to both parties, it would have taken seconds to see one lad was stabbed and could be dying.
this is 100% a police issue, something is broken to believe one side over the other without witnesses to the point you believe him when he said the guy hadn't been stabbed.
The officers have to be held to account and made to explain there actions, because there failure to act could have led to a life that could have been saved being lost.
Racism should not be a valid defence either, if the lad had made racist comments, take his picture, video him and report it to the police, dont take the law in to your own hands and become judge, jury and executioner, just want to add there is no proof racist comments were made, maybe its just been said to justify his actions, since they hid the weapon, I think its likely just an excuse.
Last edited:
Wild Card
Striker
Liter
Literally the first word. Identification of his religion first. Not just male assailant violently attacks another male with a bladed weapon.
What did i play down in the list copilot wrote? I made no call or judgement. It would be interesting to see which bits you think we're played down in that statement.
Per the information coming out, the video starts once the assailant becomes violent so at this stage we won't know or not if the allegations are true.
And you are right I despise the mail. Leading with emotional discord rather than statements of neutral facts to get people more riled up than they ordinary would be.
Literally the first word. Identification of his religion first. Not just male assailant violently attacks another male with a bladed weapon.
What did i play down in the list copilot wrote? I made no call or judgement. It would be interesting to see which bits you think we're played down in that statement.
Per the information coming out, the video starts once the assailant becomes violent so at this stage we won't know or not if the allegations are true.
And you are right I despise the mail. Leading with emotional discord rather than statements of neutral facts to get people more riled up than they ordinary would be.
Last edited:
