I saw that a while back and I'm sure it was said they would also look at the possibly of getting grants for the wider area infrastructure regeneration.
Craig Hope was one who reported it
You must be logged on to see external links
However, Confidential understands that a ‘pitch document’ has been circulated with a view to securing finance on the project. While still at an exploratory stage, it is thought any debt would belong to the club in the long term, rather than PIF.
For example, if the cost of a new stadium is to total £2billion, it could be that half would be funded by PIF and the Reuben Brothers (15 per cent owners) and half taken out as a loan.
Sources have stressed that this is standard practice and is the finance model used by other Premier League clubs when building new stadiums or redeveloping existing ones.
Confidential has been reminded that PIF is ‘not a sugar daddy’ and that the key letter in their acronym is the ‘I’ for ‘investment’. Despite infrastructure costs falling outside the Premier League’s Profit and Sustainability Rules, the owners will make an investment decision and finance the project in the same way they would other ventures within the PIF portfolio. It is likely that a Special Purpose Vehicle - a new company - would be created to facilitate the stadium project.
This was about the grants thing and they've got the Taylor Wimpey Park & Ride sorted for next season so they're getting there I suppose improving transport links
You must be logged on to see external links