chopsfc007
Striker
Really as soon as we had a bad spell we are "mentally weak like last season"No evidence of over reaction. Posters aren't allowed to express frustration?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really as soon as we had a bad spell we are "mentally weak like last season"No evidence of over reaction. Posters aren't allowed to express frustration?
If he was playing for us he'd be injured.This partnership is taking the match away from us.
This x100. Could have done with Coughlin in this situation.
True. How tf have Lancs kept him fit for three games?If he was playing for us he'd be injured.
Haven't seen that comment but we were mentally weak last season owing to poor leadership.Stubborn partnerships are frustrating-it's a natural reaction.Really as soon as we had a bad spell we are "mentally weak like last season"
Yes and one bad spell in a game doesn't constitute stuff like thatHaven't seen that comment but we were mentally weak last season owing to poor leadership.
Looking at him now. Once his injuries persisted why didn't he convert to a batsman, he's got some talent.If he was playing for us he'd be injured.
I said that long ago about Coggers.Looking at him now. Once his injuries persisted why didn't he convert to a batsman, he's got some talent.
I haven't seen a reference to "mental weakness" in this threadYes and one bad spell in a game doesn't constitute stuff like that
Yes and one bad spell in a game doesn't constitute stuff like that
So you think one bad spell constitutes being called mentally weakPosters should be allowed to express frustration without censure
It's a reaction brought about by frustration. I fully understand it although I haven't seen the term "mentally weak" used in this thread.So you think one bad spell constitutes being called mentally weak
Looking at him now. Once his injuries persisted why didn't he convert to a batsman, he's got some talent.
Currently +4.Are we behind the over rate? If not, I’ve no idea why they’re bowling spin.
So signing Aldridge and roach means we haven't addressed itIt's a reaction brought about by frustration. I fully understand it although I haven't seen the term "mentally weak" used in this thread.
Our bowling reserves are weak and haven't been addressed.
We clearly haven't. Roach is clearly past his best, although Aldridge is promising,no more.So signing Aldridge and roach means we haven't addressed it