not spavin
Full Back
I'd say the past 24 months, the progress made, the 'til the end campaigns, improvements in social media, the merchandising etc, it's all better than it's been in years, and in some respects, ever.
It's a world away from the cold ownership of Short and the monkeys we had running the place under him. Nor is it the small time bullshit we saw under Donald & Methven.
Having Quinny in the boardroom was great, but even then I'm not sure they quite managed to tap into the fanbase and create the sort of buzz we have at the minute.
Murray did some great things for the club, and the Reid years were great, but too much had gone on beforehand. Even when we were flying, many never took to him. He never had the money to give the fans what the truly wanted.
90% of the buzz is down to results. Let's be honest. If we having a Leeds-style season with no derby wins and a lot more struggle you wouldn't have anything like the feel good factor.
What good ownership gives you is a bit more patience and a bit more connection. If the fans see themselves reflected in how the club is run then they'll forgive a bad run and be a bit more understanding of a player sale.
That's why knowing what video to put on the screens or what design to put on the shirt really, really matters. And why using the club to flirt with politicians or surrendering the club's bars to our rivals really matters too.
It looks like Burwell is a shrewd commercial operator, and that could mean we're able to increase our sponsorship income and global reach. But if we did that at the expense of the club's connection to local fans then it's a net negative. The biggest selling point of Sunderland AFC is the fact that we have a massive, passionate and local fanbase. There's a reason why they didn't make a documentary about the players. That has to come first. It has to be a fan-first business. Fans are the business. And you don't have to be from Sunderland to understand that, but it really, really helps.