• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Look North/Tyne Tees Coverage ***Europa League Special***

A perfectly serious point based on fact.

Dawn Thewlis actually finished the coverage by saying "we really need an international break". Clearly when she says "we" she only means Newcastle (obviously Sunderland would not want an international break as they have the momentum of a victory).

Conclusive proof of bias.
Unbelievable really. If they were beaten off man c or something, but another team in region. Dear me
 

BBC complaint submitted:

"There was some racism, which was regrettable, as was the goalkeeping for Sunderland's first goal"

Is this seriously the extent of your reporting into a racist incident at St.James Park which caused a match to be paused under the racism protocol for the first time?

Were the videos of Sunderland supporters being attacked with bottles and the windscreen of the team coach being put out not worthy of inclusion in your report?

Why did the presenters speak as though they were at a funeral?

Why did this item rank so low on your schedule when ITV Tyne Tees had it as the main story and featured interviews with anti-racism spokespeople?

I rather suspect that, if these acts had been committed by Sunderland fans instead of Newcastle the content would have been vastly different.

This is the most biased reporting and is verging on Trump-level propaganda.

I look forward to your explanation as to why you seem to consider racism not important.
Spot on 👍🏼
Remember Edwards had to apologise when he suggested, after Johnson scored and ran away with his arms out, that he was mocking the plane crash when Newcastle supporters died. He had to pay a fine.
Twat
 
BBC complaint submitted:

"There was some racism, which was regrettable, as was the goalkeeping for Sunderland's first goal"

Is this seriously the extent of your reporting into a racist incident at St.James Park which caused a match to be paused under the racism protocol for the first time?

Were the videos of Sunderland supporters being attacked with bottles and the windscreen of the team coach being put out not worthy of inclusion in your report?

Why did the presenters speak as though they were at a funeral?

Why did this item rank so low on your schedule when ITV Tyne Tees had it as the main story and featured interviews with anti-racism spokespeople?

I rather suspect that, if these acts had been committed by Sunderland fans instead of Newcastle the content would have been vastly different.

This is the most biased reporting and is verging on Trump-level propaganda.

I look forward to your explanation as to why you seem to consider racism not important.
Wish i had seen this and copied and pasted it instead of sending my rant in.
 
Luke Edwards on racism: "Very regrettable that as was the goalkeeping from Aaron Ramsdale." A direct quote, that.

I used to think the Look North Korea stuff was a bit overdone but that was incredible. Two NUFC fans talking about the losing team more than the winners. Shocking all around.
The difference is shocking and for those that missed it, here's the 2 links (they may expire in 24 hours)

ITV, 1st item for just over 4 mins about the racism and violence, then just before 16mins another 3 and a half mins showing fan interviews etc


BBC, just over 2 minutes long starting around 13:40ish

 
Last edited:
The difference is shocking and for those that missed it, here's the 2 links (they may expire in 24 hours)

ITV, 1st item for just over 4 mins about the racism and violence, then just before 16mins another 3 and a half mins showing fan interviews etc


BBC, just over 2 minutes long starting around 13:40ish

That is incredible 🤔 utterly shocking from those 2 on BBC a disgrace
 
BBC complaint submitted:

"There was some racism, which was regrettable, as was the goalkeeping for Sunderland's first goal"

Is this seriously the extent of your reporting into a racist incident at St.James Park which caused a match to be paused under the racism protocol for the first time?

Were the videos of Sunderland supporters being attacked with bottles and the windscreen of the team coach being put out not worthy of inclusion in your report?

Why did the presenters speak as though they were at a funeral?

Why did this item rank so low on your schedule when ITV Tyne Tees had it as the main story and featured interviews with anti-racism spokespeople?

I rather suspect that, if these acts had been committed by Sunderland fans instead of Newcastle the content would have been vastly different.

This is the most biased reporting and is verging on Trump-level propaganda.

I look forward to your explanation as to why you seem to consider racism not important.
Used this as inspiration to write my own. Cheers
 
If the twats had beaten us the whole show would have been dedicated to it.
It's not paranoia, it's blatant, the disappointment in her voice when talking about it, they need to remember it's a game between 2 teams they are meant to broadcast on. Honestly think this should be addressed. If you are from Sunderland, you are not getting bang for your buck.
 
Back
Top