• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested

John Steed said:
What was the newspaper's source that nobody else had?
Click to expand...
Dunno .A few reports of him paying though. I wonder why the palace wont release who funded it,and where the money came from( like numerous m.p's have been asking). Seems a bit strange. Meanwhile
You must be logged on to see external links
 

Darlo1973 said:
Absolutely. Any individuals, no matter who they are, should be subject to the law.

It's just some people seem to be gleefully hoping that this will be the end of the monarchy. Even if it was the King himself being arrested then there is a system to replace him.
Click to expand...
Sovereign immunity means that Charles cannot be arrested.
 
Skylon said:
Dunno .A few reports of him paying though. I wonder why the palace wont release who funded it,and where the money came from( like numerous m.p's have been asking). Seems a bit strange. Meanwhile
You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
So fuck all proof.

And Meanwhile a newspaper says "He may fund", so fuck all again.

The story actually says the King is determined that the taxpayer does not pick up the bill, and then speculates whether the King will fund it.

You are quoting stories that disprove your argument, you dopey fucker.

You are so full of shit man. 🤣🤣🤣
 
Last edited:
Hansel said:
But not arrested as you incorrectly posted.
Click to expand...

Point taken.

No copper is going to arrest HM but if it got to the point where one was warranted then Parliament would step in. Under a constitutional monarchy that has to be the case. The absolute monarchy ended centuries ago and only exists with the will of the people's elected representatives.
 
The King of Um said:
Kim-Jong Charles has
You must be logged on to see external links
when speaking to the media which demands precise knowledge of every question in advance (and any deviation in the interview would lead to it being immediately terminated), representatives in the editing suite throughout, the right to know and approve anyone else featuring in the programme, and the right to remove the entire interview before broadcast.

Don't want the peasants to see the wizard behind the cucurtain
Click to expand...
Same Charles that was best mates with Saville for the best part of 30 years? Mates with him until he died.

The same Savile that was a paedophile necrophiliac on gargantuan proportions who had protection from the very top...

What? Charles didn't know? Hmmm we're hearing a lot of that from the elites aren't we?
 
Nasser Butt-Head said:
Same Charles that was best mates with Saville for the best part of 30 years? Mates with him until he died.

The same Savile that was a paedophile necrophiliac on gargantuan proportions who had protection from the very top...

What? Charles didn't know? Hmmm we're hearing a lot of that from the elites aren't we?
Click to expand...

Same as he didn't know about voracious sexual offender Bishop Peter Ball when he gave him a house to live him and promised him in writing that he would 'see off' one of his victims ('that ghastly man').
 
The King of Um said:
Same as he didn't know about voracious sexual offender Bishop Peter Ball when he gave him a house to live him and promised him in writing that he would 'see off' one of his victims ('that ghastly man').
Click to expand...
Charles has polished his PR lately, I'll give him that. Even has plebs calling his horse queenie now.

Those with longer memories know what he is.
 
Georgewhitt said:
So fuck all proof.

And Meanwhile a newspaper says "He may fund", so fuck all again.

The story actually says the King is determined that the taxpayer does not pick up the bill, and then speculates whether the King will fund it.

You are quoting stories that disprove your argument, you dopey fucker.

You are so full of shit man. 🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...
Calm down bairn.I know you love king tampon,and he can do know wrong,but why wont the palace publish where the money come from to pay the nonces victim off? Seems strange,no?
 
Nasser Butt-Head said:
Same Charles that was best mates with Saville for the best part of 30 years? Mates with him until he died.

The same Savile that was a paedophile necrophiliac on gargantuan proportions who had protection from the very top...

What? Charles didn't know? Hmmm we're hearing a lot of that from the elites aren't we?
Click to expand...
Careful now. You'll have the 'defend the king at all costs' mob onto you
 
Georgewhitt said:
You're answering your own questions now.

You're like a fish wife spreading gossip and believing every worrd.

Too easy this.

Bored now.
Click to expand...
What gossip? M.p's have asked the palace to show where the money come from to pay the nonces victim off. The palace have refused to disclose it. Why do you think this is?
 
Skylon said:
What gossip? M.p's have asked the palace to show where the money come from to pay the nonces victim off. The palace have refused to disclose it. Why do you think this is?
Click to expand...
Source of Funds: Reports indicate the settlement, estimated at up to £12 million, was funded by private sources. The late Queen Elizabeth II was reported to have contributed a significant amount, with additional funds coming from Prince Philip's estate

🥱🥱🥱
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top