The Astronaut.. paramount plus, sci fi horror thing..
Load of shite..
Load of shite..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will give that a watch tonight after that review.The Astronaut.. paramount plus, sci fi horror thing..
Load of shite..
I wish id checked out the reviews before I watched itWill give that a watch tonight after that review.
Cheers.
What's it about?The Astronaut.. paramount plus, sci fi horror thing..
Load of shite..
Crop rotation in the 14th century..What's it about?
Sounds like the follow up to the Invisible Man 1956Crop rotation in the 14th century..
Wuthering Heights (2026) - Omniplex
Big budget A-list 'adaptation' of Wuthering Heights from the director of the excellentSaltburn. I put adaptation in inverted commas because, aside from the character names and a few of the events in the film, it doesn't really have relation to the original novel. It only covers about third of the timeline of the original novel, and even with that remaining third there are significant changes and bits of 'artistic licence'.
Didn't work for me at all. The visual style is massively overblown and glossy, to the point where it felt like watching a 2hr 15min high concept perfume advert, or Lady Gaga music video. Some people might like that, but for me it was a total distraction from the action/dialogue/atmosphere of the film. Also found the acting and directing to be histrionic and overdramatised to the point of it seeming like pure charcature, particularly of Catherine.
I'm not a prude, but I also found all the sex in it didn't work at all. Part of what works so well in the novel is that everything is so achingly repressed and hidden away behind closed doors, all left to the imagination. With this is was like watching 50 Shades of Bronte at times.
Not my cup of tea.
4/10
Wuthering Heights (2026) - Omniplex
Big budget A-list 'adaptation' of Wuthering Heights from the director of the excellentSaltburn. I put adaptation in inverted commas because, aside from the character names and a few of the events in the film, it doesn't really have relation to the original novel. It only covers about third of the timeline of the original novel, and even with that remaining third there are significant changes and bits of 'artistic licence'.
Didn't work for me at all. The visual style is massively overblown and glossy, to the point where it felt like watching a 2hr 15min high concept perfume advert, or Lady Gaga music video. Some people might like that, but for me it was a total distraction from the action/dialogue/atmosphere of the film. Also found the acting and directing to be histrionic and overdramatised to the point of it seeming like pure charcature, particularly of Catherine.
I'm not a prude, but I also found all the sex in it didn't work at all. Part of what works so well in the novel is that everything is so achingly repressed and hidden away behind closed doors, all left to the imagination. With this is was like watching 50 Shades of Bronte at times.
Not my cup of tea.
4/10
Proper shite probably, but I really enjoyed it!!Predator Badlands 2025 watched it on Disney channel at the weekend different take on the predator films and quite enjoyable watch. Rate it 7/10 worth a watch .
50 Shades of Bronte