• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Geertruida


The club have known for weeks then hence his omission at West Ham, perhaps someone out the blue will be announced soon.
 
allmagsaretossas said:
This must be why we brought aleksic back
Click to expand...
Would have made more sense to bring Browne back from Boro, if we are looking for cover at CDM. I would say he stands out ahead of other options we have in the squad as we speak imo

I dont think Gert is going anywhere, unless we get adequate cover.

I think he will go, but we will announce a replacement.
 
Coeus said:
Who said anything about slavery?

It's true that clubs will seldom exercise the clause when the player no longer wants to be there, but that's very different from requiring further acceptance.
Click to expand...
The option to buy clause is always cognisant of the players wishes and agreement at the time of it being triggered!Your simply wrong and i know its hard for you but it is what it is!..there is no "seldom" and your requiring further acceptance is nonsense..the deal would be worded on the lines of if the club want the player these are the terms of the deal and the final completion will always be down to the player.
 
Blockheed said:
Only works for me if we are bringing better or more needed player. He’s a first team player ffs, and we have a small squad to start with.

Smacks of penny pinching to me.

He’s getting game time here. Now we know why he did get on at West Ham. Screw the bin dippers.
Click to expand...
Not sure how you’ve got to penny pinching mind ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top