Mackemansj1
Striker
Like others have said so did bayer didn’t the dof say something along these lines as well as ten hag. Could all be to push up the bid.Sounds pretty definitive like, though could still be a negotiating tactic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like others have said so did bayer didn’t the dof say something along these lines as well as ten hag. Could all be to push up the bid.Sounds pretty definitive like, though could still be a negotiating tactic.
There’s every chance we don’t go for any other defender if we don’t get him. When everyone’s fit we have a fair few now at the back that can cover across the backline.Think either way we need to make a decision soon. At least with the Xhaka deal time was on our side, whereas there's only a week left here.
Aye if Seelt is staying but I think the club want him to play regularly which he won't. Plus Ballards injury record is clearly a worry so one more would be idealThere’s every chance we don’t go for any other defender if we don’t get him. When everyone’s fit we have a fair few now at the back that can cover across the backline.
You must be logged on to see external linksNot happening according to there DOF.
We definitely need another CHLeave it for 5 days or so then go back in.
Don’t think we are in a desperate position for this
He says there's no time to get in a replacement, however that is obviously not true, so yes it could be tactical. All he'd have to say is that for the good of the club it was the right decision to accept such a high bid, or something like that.Like others have said so did bayer didn’t the dof say something along these lines as well as ten hag. Could all be to push up the bid.
This is a bit different this time though, the sporting director is saying this not the coach.Same as Ten Hag said about Xhaka
Seems to be before they brought in Haegman as well…It all depends how we read his comment: Ad oggi non ci sarebbero più le condizioni per sostituirlo. 'Ad oggi' literally means 'to today', but really means 'thus far'.
'Thus far the conditions aren't there any more to replace him'. They've let one defender leave, and wouldn't have let him if they thought Lucumi was off. But he might be, depending on the situation. Door not closed, I'd conclude.
ThisThere’s every chance we don’t go for any other defender if we don’t get him. When everyone’s fit we have a fair few now at the back that can cover across the backline.
I’d be surprised if his fat pay rise at Bologna was even half of his pay at SAFc plus any sign on feeThink this is over. Lucumi probably gets a fat pay rise so will come out and commit to Bologna. Wonder if we have an alternative?
Don’t think we definitely need one - we’d like one. But they seem relaxed if they don’t get him. Seems it’s Lucumi or nothing.We definitely need another CH
Obvious thing to do, they'll come running to accept our offer. There's no bidding wars going on.Leave it for 5 days or so then go back in.
Don’t think we are in a desperate position for this