I don’t think it’s him personallyNot this thread one of few not trusting technology either
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think it’s him personallyNot this thread one of few not trusting technology either
I'd be shocked mate posting pattern when not trusting tech etc is very reminiscentI don’t think it’s him personally
OK but if you are suggesting he's on here under a different name, he really isn't.
He can't get back on despite his ban being long over.
Love it personally.
Honesty just totally shines through on this board at timesI don’t think it’s him personally
I think it’s unrealistic to not have a Lords test at all, buts it’s fundamentally wrong that it’s treated any different from the other test grounds.
It should be on the rota and treated the same as other test grounds.
I am sure the members and fans at other test grounds love it as well.
Honesty just totally shines through on this board at times![]()
Well that would be fair too, Cricket and Football is a national game and as such played and watched by people throughout the country.It's like the England football team not having a game at Wembley though if Lords misses out on the rota.
It’s bigger and sells out for oneWell that would be fair too, Cricket and Football is a national game and as such played and watched by people throughout the country.
Therefore all of the country should get a chance to have them closer to their home if possible and the authorities should look to do that.
All am saying is why should Lords get more tests than old trafford Trent bridge etc etc
Well that would be fair too, Cricket and Football is a national game and as such played and watched by people throughout the country.
Therefore all of the country should get a chance to have them closer to their home if possible and the authorities should look to do that.
All am saying is why should Lords get more tests than old trafford Trent bridge etc etc
Not sure that fair, surely test matches should be as geographically spread as possible.It’s bigger and sells out for one
As above mate.Probably because it's the best ground? Certainly loads better than OT, Edgbaston, Rose Bowl and let's face it, it'll make the most money.
Or the reality is that you spread them to population density? Why does London get tests over CLS? Because the catchment area is several times overNot sure that fair, surely test matches should be as geographically spread as possible.
It probably sells out more as more money in London, to play the ridiculous prices, so there another sport for the rich and not ordinary folk
As above mate.
Not sure that fair, surely test matches should be as geographically spread as possible.
It probably sells out more as more money in London, to play the ridiculous prices, so there another sport for the rich and not ordinary folk
As above mate.
Well that’s a point but I am sure that population density could make they way over to the other test ground in London.Or the reality is that you spread them to population density? Why does London get tests over CLS? Because the catchment area is several times over
Yeah I can see what you saying up to a point.I get what you are saying but it's a fantastic ground, a great occasion, it holds the most, it'll bring in the most income and if you want to protect test cricket then it needs a test match every year - all players want to play a test at Lords.
You have a point about sharing it over the country, I won’t deny itWell that’s a point but I am sure that population density could make they way over to the other test ground in London.
Is it fair to always have a test match in London?
Possibly.
Is it fair to have two in London every single year? I don’t think soo.
Is it fair that the furthest Northern venue for the next Ashes is Nottingham.
Absolutely not imo
Yeah I can see what you saying up to a point.
It’s certainly an iconic venue, but don’t like the fact they take advantage of that charge the prices that they do, therefore almost a double whammy, ordinary folk may not be able to afford that and other ordinary folk in other parts of the country miss out.
I think it's because the tourists traditionally are given a game at "the home of cricket". Lords only get 2 tests if there are 2 touring teams. Lords and the Oval raise by far the biggest revenue. Hence Oval always hosts the final tests. Provincial grounds e.g. Chester-le -Street can't get anywhere near those revenues. The only criticism is why Hampshire appear to be in the circuit.Well that would be fair too, Cricket and Football is a national game and as such played and watched by people throughout the country.
Therefore all of the country should get a chance to have them closer to their home if possible and the authorities should look to do that.
All am saying is why should Lords get more tests than old trafford Trent bridge etc etc
Yeah your population density is certainly a fair argument up to a point.You have a point about sharing it over the country, I won’t deny it
but there are plenty of reasons why London gets 2. They sell for starters