-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Lancashire v Durham T20 (Sunday)
- Thread starter Aidan11
- Start date
Good result I suppose as the bears lost
mackembhoy
Striker
Then we can only get a max of 32 points.
Which then means you could be in a situation with 6 clubs on all 32 points come next Friday. So become a NRR shootout.
Really is a must win on Tuesday to keep it in our hands.
Last edited:
36 points with two wins ?
mackembhoy
Striker
Yep and we'd be definitely top 2 then.
Only us Northants and Lancs can get 36 points and we play Northants.
Lancs can still get 40 points
TheRey
Striker
Just like last year eh?
mackembhoy
Striker
I was there don't remind me.Just like last year eh?
That was a classic Durham batting performance like today and friday
Scrapping our way to total that was something on the board but easily chaseable if the other side doesn't bat like morons.
Nope third
North Group
| Rank | Team | Played | Won | Lost | Tied | No Result | Net Run Rate | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lancashire Lightning | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +0.535 | 32 |
| 2 | Northamptonshire Steelbacks | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +0.207 | 32 |
| 3 | Durham | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +0.598 | 28 |
| 4 | Bears | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | +0.228 | 28 |
| 5 | Worcestershire Rapids | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | +0.057 | 24 |
| 6 | Leicestershire Foxes | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | −0.211 | 24 |
| 7 | Nottinghamshire Outlaws | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | −0.565 | 24 |
| 8 | Yorkshire | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | −0.383 | 16 |
| 9 | Derbyshire Falcons | 13 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | −0.510 | 16 |
GordonMuchallNo1Fan
Striker
Oh well
mackembhoy
Striker
Look at the NRR of the top 3 in the South group man.
We've not go a f***ing chance even if we got Hampshire at home. We need to finish 1st to have a chance of finals day like
We've not go a f***ing chance even if we got Hampshire at home. We need to finish 1st to have a chance of finals day like
South Group
| Rank | Team | Played | Won | Lost | Tied | No Result | Net Run Rate | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Somerset | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +1.152 | 40 |
| 2 | Surrey | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +1.214 | 32 |
| 3 | Hampshire Hawks | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +1.071 | 30 |
| 4 | Glamorgan | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | −0.303 | 24 |
| 5 | Sussex Sharks | 12 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | +0.165 | 22 |
| 6 | Kent Spitfires | 12 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | −0.528 | 22 |
| 7 | Gloucestershire | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | −0.657 | 20 |
| 8 | Middlesex | 11 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | −0.612 | 16 |
| 9 | Essex | 12 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | −1.628 | 10 |
bedlington mackem
Striker
Never thought I would say this but our lads could learn some lessons from our women on how to control the game. Too much reckless stuff from our men atm
Inside Forward
Winger
Been poor all season IMO.
Durham-Mackem41
Midfield
Easily his worst year lost a lot of zip only that spell away at Yorkshire recently where he looked like usual Potts.
But we should have better cover. Bringing in Aldridge just illustrates how inadequate our attempts to address obvious shortcomings have been.
chopsfc007
Striker
Aldridge was playing anyway and people wanted Bedders back in
The Pope is a Catholic
Clearly I wasn't referring to this game but the fact we had to resort to bringing in inexperienced loan players to address a shortage that was obvious before the season began.
Last edited:
