Kent_Mackem
Striker
Why isn't this 'Bowled and Caught' please?
Surely it is far more logical and actually in the correct order.
Surely it is far more logical and actually in the correct order.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't answer the question Hetty as its asking why we dont mention the delivery element before the dismissal method given that's the order in which the play unfolds.Caught takes precedence over all other methods of dismissal except bowled
Scoreboards usually state the dismissal then the bowler so this follows suit.Why isn't this 'Bowled and Caught' please?
Surely it is far more logical and actually in the correct order.![]()
Let's say Anderson delivered and it was caught by Root it would be caught Root, Bowled Anderson. So even if the same player bowls and catches they keep the same format, with the dismissal method trumping the delivery.Why isn't this 'Bowled and Caught' please?
Surely it is far more logical and actually in the correct order.![]()
They are now, I think - usually the fielder's name is in brackets after the dismissal type.On a similar note its always annoyed me that when a player is Run Out the fielder doesnt get credited.
You can throw a ball over a great distance, with pin point accuracy, the stumps go flying.... but its not credited on the scorecard
It’s always been ‘the dismissal’ followed by the bowlers detail.Why isn't this 'Bowled and Caught' please?
Surely it is far more logical and actually in the correct order.![]()