• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Two Bob owners

Short was a fine example of how to become a millionaire. Start as a Billionaire then buy a football club.
 

Mnemonic said:
Do you want someone to donate their own money so we can be more successful. Dead easy spending other people money.

Why does this club deserve better and not any of the other 92?

Short lost a fortune on SAFC.
Click to expand...

He should have done a better job then. I don't care about the personal wealth of Ellis Short. I do care about SAFC, and he was by far the worst owner we have ever had. Nobody else has taken us so far down the pyramid as he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Niz
Binxy said:
Are you seriously saying this squad is better than any of Shorts squads?
Click to expand...
No. I’m saying its resale value is higher than any of Shorts squads which given we’re in the Chanpionship is pretty outstanding work from our friend Speakman.
 
LRW said:
He should have done a better job then. I don't care about the personal wealth of Ellis Short. I do care about SAFC, and he was by far the worst owner we have ever had. Nobody else has taken us so far down the pyramid as he did.
Click to expand...
But he’s also the owner that spent the most money, yet people are crying because we’re not doing that now.

Spending other people’s money is easy.

Spending it effectively is extremely difficult.
 
SPUFF said:
I think fees for the likes of neil, rigg, patto etc are going to be under half what some folk expect. Red n white specs.

Also keep reading what a star mayendas going to be, I must be watching different matches.
Click to expand...
Be lucky to get £8/10 million for Neil & cirkin £5/7 million both in last year of contract
 
Mnemonic said:
But he’s also the owner that spent the most money, yet people are crying because we’re not doing that now.

Spending other people’s money is easy.

Spending it effectively is extremely difficult.
Click to expand...

Which is exactly the point I made on the first page of this thread.

Anyone who defends Ellis Short's time at Sunderland can only be doing so because the only thing they look at is how much money an owner chucks at a club, and that's a ridiculous way to judge owners.
 
LRW said:
Which is exactly the point I made on the first page of this thread.

Anyone who defends Ellis Short's time at Sunderland can only be doing so because the only thing they look at is how much money an owner chucks at a club, and that's a ridiculous way to judge owners.
Click to expand...
Short shoved Keano…I know things weren’t rosey at the time but that was the pits
 
Red said:
You need to brush up on your SAFC history mate.
Click to expand...

No I don't, thanks. Ellis Short is the only owner we have ever had who has taken the club two levels down from where we were when he bought us. The only other owner who ever took us to League One at all had already taken us back out, at the first time of asking.
 
LRW said:
No I don't, thanks. Ellis Short is the only owner we have ever had who has taken the club two levels down from where we were when he bought us. The only other owner who ever took us to League One at all had already taken us back out, at the first time of asking.
Click to expand...
You worded it poorly. This explanation was better.
 
Binxy said:
But it's not.

Bent, Gyan, Pickford, Henderson, etc....
Also you you have to take into account inflation.
Click to expand...
I think you’ve listed pretty much every player we made a profit from under Short.
I do agree though, for a period the squads in the premier league would have had higher valuations but we signed some utter shite for big money.
What I would say about the current squad is that we have much better value for the money we have spent.
 
joop said:
I think you’ve listed pretty much every player we made a profit from under Short.
I do agree though, for a period the squads in the premier league would have had higher valuations but we signed some utter shite for big money.
What I would say about the current squad is that we have much better value for the money we have spent.
Click to expand...
That's not what he said though, this squad is not worth as much as the majority of our squads under Short.
It's not even up for debate.

Some nugget even said this squad is better than any squad under Short ffs.
😂
 
Binxy said:
That's not what he said though, this squad is not worth as much as the majority of our squads under Short.
It's not even up for debate.

Some nugget even said this squad is better than any squad under Short ffs.
😂
Click to expand...
Well if you read what I said, I agreed with you but I just added another point of view. I hope that’s ok. 😘
 
Things Change said:
Are you KLD? You must be the only fan who thinks the squads resale value is more important than league position if not.
Click to expand...
They tend to go hand in hand in the long run. Increase the value of the squad and it's hard to not get better in the league table.

I do feel like we're building on solid foundations under this owner. Pretty strong financial position, making improvements to the stadium/club shop, thinking long term with our signings. I personally think it's better than Short getting us into more and more debt every year trying desparately to survive in the PL. But I'm not gonna argue this squad of players is better than any from 2008-2016, for example.
 
This my dads bigger than your dad is pointless really.Short tried and failed it cost him 150mil.This owner has yet to show me that he has any ambition at all.He will sell players this summer for large amounts by our standards regardless of which Div we are in.So lets see how the money is used.
 
NYMackem said:
20% because the championship is a decent league to watch with a load of historic clubs in it. Way more interesting than the premier league circus, which is turning into just another dull european league fought out between 3 or 4 clubs with a load of cannon fodder beneath them.

And 80% because I like having a reason to see my marras and have a couple of pints in the Sunderland pubs of my youth once a fortnight.

You have a point that it is a very short sample size, but the way the TV money is going, plus two years where the parachute payments go back into the prem rather than spread around the lower leagues does feel like a tipping point.
Click to expand...
Not the first to say they go fir a day out. That's sad when you think about what a football club should be. I want to watch a team that is doing everything it can to be as good as it can be. As far as the league above goes, many have a go whilst out of it but would change once in it. We can only worry about staying up if we got there. The mags, forest and villa were promited fairly recently and all are in or around the Champions league. Leicester have won the fa cup and league in the last 10 years. If you tell yourself your beaten before you start that's exactly what you'd be. The club would need to change how it operates, something I don't think they want which is why I believe they don't want promotion. But it's certainly big enough to sustain premier league football long term.
 
scott934 said:
They tend to go hand in hand in the long run. Increase the value of the squad and it's hard to not get better in the league table.

I do feel like we're building on solid foundations under this owner. Pretty strong financial position, making improvements to the stadium/club shop, thinking long term with our signings. I personally think it's better than Short getting us into more and more debt every year trying desparately to survive in the PL. But I'm not gonna argue this squad of players is better than any from 2008-2016, for example.
Click to expand...

Improvements to the stadium are surface scratching IMO.

It needs way more attention than I think the owners will give it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top