• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

CC : Durham v Warwickshire


Not sure what we are actually trying to do currently managed 24 runs in 13 overs for the loss of 3 wickets.

They just seem intent on getting through to the new ball and McKinney is being starved of the strike.
 
chopsfc007 said:
And not as good as the players in the team
Click to expand...
Fair enough if that's your view, but I very much doubt we signed Rhodes to replace De Leede.

A top 3 batsman playing at 7 is stupid. Not sure on the logic from Campbell there, seems a just pick everyone option rather than make a call over Gay/Rhodes at 3.
 
mackembhoy said:
Fair enough if that's your view, but I very much doubt we signed Rhodes to replace De Leede.

A top 3 batsman playing at 7 is stupid. Not sure on the logic from Campbell there, seems a just pick everyone option rather than make a call over Gay/Rhodes at 3.
Click to expand...
De leede averaging 31 isn't exactly good
 
mackembhoy said:
Fair enough if that's your view, but I very much doubt we signed Rhodes to replace De Leede.

A top 3 batsman playing at 7 is stupid. Not sure on the logic from Campbell there, seems a just pick everyone option rather than make a call over Gay/Rhodes at 3.
Click to expand...

It is stupid I agree but seems like we might have?

But who do you replace Rhodes with? We’d still be unbalanced
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top