• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Tommy Watson ( ...off to Brighton)


If the club rate Watson highly it would be mad to sell him now. With just a dozen games at senior level under his belt we’re not getting big money for him.
City paid about £12m for some kid a few year back whod only played 19 times for fulham. Barely scores or creates still now, £12m! 😉
 
Makes sense him and Mundle cant both play when they are back.
So we got to either offer him a new deal or cash in.
 
Makes sense him and Mundle cant both play when they are back.
So we got to either offer him a new deal or cash in.

In my opinion, Watson will be by far the better player of the two. His touch, composure and quality on the ball even at this age looks a step above Mundle (who has other attributes). It’ll be a crying shame if a local lad is sold before he’s even had the opportunity to make his mark at all here
 
In my opinion, Watson will be by far the better player of the two. His touch, composure and quality on the ball even at this age looks a step above Mundle (who has other attributes). It’ll be a crying shame if a local lad is sold before he’s even had the opportunity to make his mark at all here
Theres no offers in for Mundle though.
Besides Tommy is still injured.No clubs daft enough to buy an injured player.
 
Last edited:
Is there a rumoured fee?

I can't imagine Brighton paying big money for him when he's had so little first team exposure.

If he wants to leave and won't sign a new contract, then sell him in the summer to the highest bidder. That way we'll get the benefit of him playing for the last few months of the season, and most likely increasing his value in the meantime.
 
Back
Top