• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Le Fée’s debut performance


I’d leave him out wide for a couple of games mesel until he gets fitter and/or more used to Championship football. Stick Mayenda on for Roberts anarl. Both wad make opposition FBs a bit more wary about joining in attacks.
 
He’s a superb footballer. By far the best player on the pitch last night until he tired.

Once he’s fully up to speed he’ll be brilliant for us. I would prefer seeing him centrally going forward, especially when Mundle and Watson are back.
 
Lucky1985 said:
Thoughts?

For me, I thought you could see the quality was there, though maybe lacking in match fitness a touch.

I thought the chemistry wasn’t there with Cirkin yet, which I guess could be down to language barrier atm, and I think it will come with practice.

He looked to me like he will be better suited to a cm role, but it’s good to see that he’s adaptable enough that he isn’t just restricted to playing as a 6, 8, or a 10, as he could play on either wing too.

7/10 hopefully there’s much more to come.
Click to expand...
He oozed class, some saying put him in the middle of the park, but i think him and Cirkin can be a massive threat down the left flank for us against teams that don't defend as much as Burnley especially.
Obviously when Munde returns, and then Tommy Watson it gives us more options.
When they're all available we will have around 9/10 genuine quality players (at this level) for the 5 midfield places, that is some competition for places.

Samed, Neil.
Bellingham, Rigg, Le Fee, Browne.
Roberts, Mundle, Watson, Poveda.
Aleksic, Aouchiche.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSC
HitchBerg said:
He oozed class, some saying put him in the middle of the park, but i think him and Cirkin can be a massive threat down the left flank for us against teams that don't defend as much as Burnley especially.
Obviously when Munde returns, and then Tommy Watson it gives us more options.
When they're all available we will have around 9/10 genuine quality players (at this level) for the 5 midfield places, that is some competition for places.

Samed, Neil.
Bellingham, Rigg, Le Fee, Browne.
Roberts, Mundle, Watson, Poveda.
Aleksic, Aouchiche.
Click to expand...
Tbh I would tell Poveda to pack up and do one.
 
Ohnonotagain said:
Tbh I would tell Poveda to pack up and do one.
Click to expand...
He wasn't one of the 9/10 ;)

I agree, when he arrived he was in a very similar position to Connolly in that he looked like he had talent but with a lot to prove, why he was given a 3 year contract to Connoly's 1 year is a mystery.
If he had only been given 1 year, like Connolly he would probably be on his way this January.
 
Looked great, exceeded my expectations of what I thought I’d see in his 1st game.

We need to get him more centrally though, and specially in 433, I would rather Rigg was wide than him.
 
3.142 said:
Expect him to be our best player.

And you don't play your best player out of position.
Click to expand...
You do if it makes your team stronger as a whole.

If we have nobody else who can play on the left wing, then dropping Rigg and playing Le Fée through the middle, wouldn’t be as strong as having a player of Riggs quality in the centre and Le Fée on the left.

I know it’s not always that simple, as we have Aouchiche as an option on the left, but I think k would rather play Rigg in the middle and Le Fée out of position, than bench Rigg for Aouchiche and playing le Fée through the middle.

It’s a different situation when we have Watson fit though.
 
6 as a debut. He tired massively and Rigg should have played 90. Is RLB blinkered already, he never subs Neil already and we know Jobe’s contract doesn’t allow him being subbed.

Le fee has so much talent but already we’ve played him out of position. I’m not sure the manager has the balls to make the right calls.
 
Lucky1985 said:
Thoughts?

For me, I thought you could see the quality was there, though maybe lacking in match fitness a touch.

I thought the chemistry wasn’t there with Cirkin yet, which I guess could be down to language barrier atm, and I think it will come with practice.

He looked to me like he will be better suited to a cm role, but it’s good to see that he’s adaptable enough that he isn’t just restricted to playing as a 6, 8, or a 10, as he could play on either wing too.

7/10 hopefully there’s much more to come.
Click to expand...
Cirkin was a much better player when he had blonde hair. Needs a trip to the stylist - just saying like🫢😎
 
Lucky1985 said:
Thoughts?

For me, I thought you could see the quality was there, though maybe lacking in match fitness a touch.

I thought the chemistry wasn’t there with Cirkin yet, which I guess could be down to language barrier atm, and I think it will come with practice.

He looked to me like he will be better suited to a cm role, but it’s good to see that he’s adaptable enough that he isn’t just restricted to playing as a 6, 8, or a 10, as he could play on either wing too.

7/10 hopefully there’s much more to come.
Click to expand...
Enzo speaks perfect English, just a case of getting used to our style of playing and settling in. You can see he’s a class act
 
Lucky1985 said:
You do if it makes your team stronger as a whole.

If we have nobody else who can play on the left wing, then dropping Rigg and playing Le Fée through the middle, wouldn’t be as strong as having a player of Riggs quality in the centre and Le Fée on the left.

I know it’s not always that simple, as we have Aouchiche as an option on the left, but I think k would rather play Rigg in the middle and Le Fée out of position, than bench Rigg for Aouchiche and playing le Fée through the middle.

It’s a different situation when we have Watson fit though.
Click to expand...
You'd be benching Rigg for Enzo, AA out on the left where he has played well recently.

As much as I rate Rigg, he is 17 and already played a lot of games this season, along with just returning from injury. Enzo will tire and hoy Rigg on for 30 mins to make a real impact.
 
Slambo21 said:
Enzo speaks perfect English, just a case of getting used to our style of playing and settling in. You can see he’s a class act
Click to expand...
In his first interview he was asking the interviewer to speak slowly. Being able to converse in English and speaking perfect English are two very different things.

Besides which, the language on a football pitch isn’t usually normal English anyway. Most the time it’s simple short words or phrases that may not make sense even if you speak English if you haven’t used them before “overlap!” “Man on!” “Line!” Inside” “squares your ball!”
Skrabble said:
You'd be benching Rigg for Enzo, AA out on the left where he has played well recently.

As much as I rate Rigg, he is 17 and already played a lot of games this season, along with just returning from injury. Enzo will tire and hoy Rigg on for 30 mins to make a real impact.
Click to expand...
Honestly I just think it’s a case or rotation and resting now, rather than dropping
 
Last edited:
Skrabble said:
You'd be benching Rigg for Enzo, AA out on the left where he has played well recently.

As much as I rate Rigg, he is 17 and already played a lot of games this season, along with just returning from injury. Enzo will tire and hoy Rigg on for 30 mins to make a real impact.
Click to expand...
This.
I don’t get why people are so reluctant to bench Rigg, he’s going to be a top player but he’s been distinctly average for a while now, Enzo is the better player and Rigg can be an impact sub.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top