• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Jack Clarke


Ipswich would probably rather he sat on their bench than loan him back to us, they'd look daft.

At times over the past couple of years Clarke carried us, seems to have been forgotten very quickly, but at the same time it wouldn't be like he was coming back to the same side. We've looked much more balanced this season.
 
I doubt they'd loan him back, but he'd be a quality addition, especially when we're really pushing for promotion.

Mundle is 2/3 weeks away and Watson even longer. We're already playing AA out of position on the left, and although he's doing an alright job, he could easily have a few poor games or get injured himself before either of our proper wingers are back fit.

A question could be asked to Ipswich, but I suppose the other problem other than them refusing, is the amount of matchday loans we have already and if our last one is prioritised for a different player already.
 
Mboma said:
I doubt they'd loan him back, but he'd be a quality addition, especially when we're really pushing for promotion.

Mundle is 2/3 weeks away and Watson even longer. We're already playing AA out of position on the left, and although he's doing an alright job, he could easily have a few poor games or get injured himself before either of our proper wingers are back fit.

A question could be asked to Ipswich, but I suppose the other problem other than them refusing, is the amount of matchday loans we have already and if our last one is prioritised for a different player already.
Click to expand...
Le Bris has already found a way around losing the whole of our attacking left flank.
 
HitchBerg said:
Le Bris has already found a way around losing the whole of our attacking left flank.
Click to expand...

In Adil. What happens if he goes off the boil or gets injured due to not having played much in his time in a Sunderland shirt?

I've already said I seriously doubt Clarke would be made available, but if he was, we'd be mental not to take him on loan.
 
HorsePills said:
Ipswich would probably rather he sat on their bench than loan him back to us, they'd look daft.

At times over the past couple of years Clarke carried us, seems to have been forgotten very quickly, but at the same time it wouldn't be like he was coming back to the same side. We've looked much more balanced this season.
Click to expand...
It would look amazingly daft if they were to loan him back , there's no chance at all.
 
Keith S30S said:
Szmodics has been injured a couple of times this season and both times Broadhead has started ahead of Clarke.

Sorry like but Broadhead isn't in Clarke's league. It's a terrible snub by the manager.

Now Philogen has also signed. It's time for Clarke to cut his losses if he can. The manager obviously doesn't fancy him at all.
Click to expand...
Wonder what clarkes now thinking ... would he comeback
 
Mboma said:
In Adil. What happens if he goes off the boil or gets injured……
Click to expand...
The same could be said of ANY player.
Isidor, Jobe, Rigg, Neil….nobody is immune to a drop in form or (as we are all aware) an injury.
We would need 3 players for each position if we worried about that and that is not workable.
Yeah, of course cover IS needed, but things can happen at any time and rotation of the available squad or a change in tactics is what separates the good coaches from the great ones.
 
HitchBerg said:
Le Bris has already found a way around losing the whole of our attacking left flank.
Click to expand...
Utter nonsense Cirkin and Aouchiche, if he keeps up his recent form will be a decent left sided combo and he's an ex teammate of Le Fee. They know each others game. The French connection looks an exciting prospect for the last 20 games with Samed on his way back too. Clarke won't be coming back; why would he?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top