• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

New Zealand v England 3rd test Hamilton


I think Pope would be even worse than Crawley at the top of the order and Crawley would look class batting 6 in this team.
Stats say Pope is best at 3 where he averages 40. I get all the arguments why you drop him of course.

I think he’s averaged 39 this series, so whilst he looked crap today he’s largely been pretty decent.
 
Stats say Pope is best at 3 where he averages 40. I get all the arguments why you drop him of course.

I think he’s averaged 39 this series, so whilst he looked crap today he’s largely been pretty decent.
It’s a toss up between him and Smith and Smith should get it. Bethell will be better than Pope has been. And Pope isn’t an opener.
 
Ultimately the guy has had 50+ tests and averages lower 30s. Not good enough really. I get you can say same about Crawley, but in the absence of any competition he will play sadly.
Of batsmen to play at least 50 tests, I think only 1 averages less than Crawley.

He’s managed 4 hundreds in 50 odd tests @ 30 (just)

It’s time to move on with him somehow
 
Bethell (as painful as it will be to lose the left hand/right hand and height difference)
Duckett
Smith
Root
Brook
Pope (WK)
Stokes
Atkinson
Carse
Wood
? (Before this winter Bashir was nailed on for me, but he's been really poor over 6 tests)
 
Back
Top