• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Brydon Carse


Anyone else noticed that 'man' disappeared from the old scoreboard at the Riverside during last season, leaving the label 'last' for one of the windows?

Wokey, wokey!!!!
 
Sea to Shining Sea said:
Aye. But does it actually matter that they’re called player of the match?
Click to expand...
It's mildly irritating woke as was your (presumably) sarcastic response to the original comment.
Can I sit here said:
Anyone else noticed that 'man' disappeared from the old scoreboard at the Riverside during last season, leaving the label 'last' for one of the windows?

Wokey, wokey!!!!
Click to expand...
I suppose that's understandable given the scoreboard serves both men and women's matches.
 
Last edited:
Voice of fair play said:
Does it really matter at all, the best player/man gets the award for performing best in the match.

Whether it’s called man of the match or player of the match is surely nothing to be to bothered about either way.
Click to expand...
It's certainly nothing to be bothered about but equally why alter the tradition of man of the. match? Likewise why has a batsman now become a batter? Women's cricket existed for ages without the need for any change in tradition.
What does annoy though is a catch now being referred to as a grab.
 
Parkside said:
It's certainly nothing to be bothered about but equally why alter the tradition of man of the. match? Likewise why has a batsman now become a batter? Women's cricket existed for ages without the need for any change in tradition.
What does annoy though is a catch now being referred to as a grab.
Click to expand...
None of it’s as bad as having to refer at work to calling it the festive season rather than Christmas, but that’s different story altogether 😁
 
Voice of fair play said:
None of it’s as bad as having to refer at work to calling it the festive season rather than Christmas, but that’s different story altogether 😁
Click to expand...

I live in the West Midlands and a few years ago Birmingham Council decided in their infinite wisdom to rename it Winterval
 
Voice of fair play said:
None of it’s as bad as having to refer at work to calling it the festive season rather than Christmas, but that’s different story altogether 😁
Click to expand...
In Islam, Jesus is revered as one of their main Prophets, only behind their main main Mo irrc. So Muslims should have absolutely no problem with Christians celebrating the birth of JC in a Christian country.

Unless that is, your teachings come from the stricter sect emanating from Saudi Arabia. Where they don't do birthdays or any other sort of iconography. The desecration of religious and cultural sites by these people have been appalling.

So, if it's not Muslims who have a problem with Christmas being called Christmas, who does?
 
Nasser Butt-Head said:
In Islam, Jesus is revered as one of their main Prophets, only behind their main main Mo irrc. So Muslims should have absolutely no problem with Christians celebrating the birth of JC in a Christian country.

Unless that is, your teachings come from the stricter sect emanating from Saudi Arabia. Where they don't do birthdays or any other sort of iconography. The desecration of religious and cultural sites by these people have been appalling.

So, if it's not Muslims who have a problem with Christmas being called Christmas, who does?
Click to expand...

Brydon Carse?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top