Qwerty
Striker
Will KS be calling the shots?
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Jack Clarke To West Ham/Burnley/Lazio/ latest Ipswich...
- Thread starter Hetty
- Start date
- Status
Arfa Sleep
Striker
Aye that's generally the case for absolutely loads of players.
Last edited:
one footed wonder
Striker
They’ve paid 23.5 mill for player who is no better in Omari Hutchinson…..£15 to £18 mill doesn’t even get them out of Suffolk never mind to the table for talks
radjee gadjee
Striker
No. All depends on the agreement in place with the club we purchased the player from..
Henry_Hill
Winger
Palace i reckon
£18M, that just for his left leg? Clueless carrot crunchers.
Isn’t that the bloke that crippled Bristol city?
BumbleBee
Striker
No - he'll hide behind a Committee decision!
It’s a contract between clubs. Not player to club.
TikaTakaTico
Midfield
If Clarke was desperate to go then maybe we'd feel more compelled to sell- but he wasn't fussed about Burnley last year, and I can't see what has changed really.
If he goes to a promoted club, 9 times out of 10 they will come straight back down- and you end up being stuck at a club who don't need to sell you because they have parachute money, and will have insisted on a relegation wage drop in the contract (unless they are cretins). You will just end up trapped at a club, on championship wages.
He will know he is better off waiting it out until a better team make a decent offer for him and then he can go (Lazio might come back in, or West Ham)- waiting until the end if the window/January will serve him better- when other players have moved, top targets have been missed and mid table PL clubs start thinking about him as they move down their lists.
Mainly so you don't end up having to pay out money if a player stays long terms.
If he goes to a promoted club, 9 times out of 10 they will come straight back down- and you end up being stuck at a club who don't need to sell you because they have parachute money, and will have insisted on a relegation wage drop in the contract (unless they are cretins). You will just end up trapped at a club, on championship wages.
He will know he is better off waiting it out until a better team make a decent offer for him and then he can go (Lazio might come back in, or West Ham)- waiting until the end if the window/January will serve him better- when other players have moved, top targets have been missed and mid table PL clubs start thinking about him as they move down their lists.
Yes, but I always assumed that the buying club would want to insert that clause.
Mainly so you don't end up having to pay out money if a player stays long terms.
Last edited:
Inside Forward
Winger
Ipswich. 
He’d be back in the second tier this time next year.
He’d be back in the second tier this time next year.
Rip Van Fish
Striker
They paid 15m plus add ons for Liam Delap
12 goals in 70 games in the Championship
Clarke has much better figures than that
Rumours coming out of Suffolk is that he’s done his hammy again
Last edited:
Football Dinosaur
Striker
Is the player called bond?
Just what someone said from OTR i don’t know if it’s true or not
Football Dinosaur
Striker
Missed my terrible joke. I wouldn't believe anything said otr. Their record for itk iscas bad as our hit rate for strikers.
Billy Batts
Striker
What's the point in going to Ipswich. They'll be back down here after next season.
Probably be Liam miller
MadMackem10
Winger
Aye just been reading up about Broadhead. Looks like he is facing a long stint on the sidelines
- Status
