aupaalaves
Striker
To be fair to Johnson, Mcfadzean probably played more and has stayed fitter than Denver Hume
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This post made me feel very queasySaid it after Blackpool, will say it again tonight.
I don’t want the head coach of our football club to be someone who decides to start Callum McFadzean over Denver Hume. Then when it’s clear he’s getting done every time, cost us 1 goal, he doesn’t change it. Then does change it after it’s cost us 3 points.
Of course there’s the argument “these aren’t his players” - my question, if he thinks McFadz is better than Hume, do we really want to see the players he does bring in? Maguire not been getting in the squad despite him producing every time he comes off the bench?
We could be sitting pretty in second had he not tried to tinker with the team and the formation every time and cost us.
Was never a pen and we’d be f***ing fuming if that was given against us.
Got to go for me. I know he won’t be sacked before the end of the season, but we won’t achieve anything with him in charge.
This post made me feel very queasy![]()
Horrendous! I mean I knew it was bad, we all lived it, but reading that back made me realise just how low we were.Bleak times it was mate.
What are your views on Mowbray?Bleak times it was mate.
What are your views on Mowbray?
He should have been sacked in after Lincoln, and that was only a month after the OP.The nature of football means that 99.99% of the time, if you create a thread wanting a manager out at any point, you will be able to bump it to say "told you so", sooner rather than later.
Probably worth pointing out we lost 4 of the next 26 competitive games after the OP was created and got to the QF of the League Cup.
Of course it's now some sort of "told you so" moment when in reality it would have been absolutely nonsense to sack a manager who had at that point been at the club for 4 months and had lost 4 of his first 32 competitive games.
The nature of football means that 99.99% of the time, if you create a thread wanting a manager out at any point, you will be able to bump it to say "told you so", sooner rather than later.
Probably worth pointing out we lost 4 of the next 26 competitive games after the OP was created and got to the QF of the League Cup.
Of course it's now some sort of "told you so" moment when in reality it would have been absolutely nonsense to sack a manager who had at that point been at the club for 4 months and had lost 4 of his first 32 competitive games.
Got to be going some to bump your own thread from 2 and a half years ago and claim to be some wise sage in suggesting Lee Johnson might be a bit pants
He should have been sacked in after Lincoln, and that was only a month after the OP.
Gan on GrumpyOh God, this tit again. Hope we win on Saturday, not just for the points, but to keep this troll under his bridge.
Some people would have been happy to stick with him after Bolton 6 Sunderland 0.It’s easy to skew stats to suit a narrative. This thread came after a draw with Hull, which was preceded by defeats to Wigan & Charlton and followed by 2 draws, 1 win, 1 loss in the regular season before ultimately being bumped out of the playoffs by Lincoln City.
It was glaringly obvious then that we were never going anywhere with him in charge. It just took losing 6-0 to Bolton Wanderers with a side featuring Cirkin, Neil, Stewart, Evans & Batth for the some people to realise.
Have you read the first couple of pages? You’d think it was obvious that he was a useless idiot, but not to all apparently.
Had he been sacked before Lincoln we might’ve made it to Wembley that year.
Some people would have been happy to stick with him after Bolton 6 Sunderland 0.
Gonks.
Actually fair pointHave you read the first couple of pages? You’d think it was obvious that he was a useless idiot, but not to all apparently.
Had he been sacked before Lincoln we might’ve made it to Wembley that year.