• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Bid rejected for Clarke

What did we pay for Clarke?...simple economics will show what we stand to make if the "Sell-on" profit cost to Spurs is 35%, which seems the norm these days...e.g..if we paid £1.5 million and sold him for £9 mill.we'd pay £2.625m to Levy and make a net profit of...£4,87500...is it worth it?
 

Got his agent in the press asking for big offers and Burnley are low balling at 7 and 9 million.

Reminds me of Donald with Grigg when he was offering 200k when Wigan initially wanted a million before they ended up getting bored, taunting him and shafting him.
 
I think we paid spurs
£4 million with £6 million add ons so total £10 million. Spurs have a 30% sell on

Pretty sure we didn't. Everyone amounted to less than 5m in the accounts I believe. And only one or two clubs in the championship spent over two million all in last season.
 
Got his agent in the press asking for big offers and Burnley are low balling at 7 and 9 million.

Reminds me of Donald with Grigg when he was offering 200k when Wigan initially wanted a million before they ended up getting bored, taunting him and shafting him.
Don't be talking about his agent mate. You'll have Wayne The Punk and the others going down your throat for daring to suggest bids being encouraged.
Why would we owe them anything like that?
Rumoured 30% sell on. If we got 12m that's 4m ish gone straight away.
 
Last edited:
Got his agent in the press asking for big offers and Burnley are low balling at 7 and 9 million.

Reminds me of Donald with Grigg when he was offering 200k when Wigan initially wanted a million before they ended up getting bored, taunting him and shafting him.
U got a link to his agent?
 
Back
Top