• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Worst decisions in Cricket history


PeteFTM said:
What are they?

Stokes declaring on 393 on day 1 against the world’s best team with one of the worlds best batsmen on 118 not out and looking comfortable is a new and strong contender.
Click to expand...
It’s like anything else,if they’d been 14 for 2 at the end of the day it was a great decision.
 
Darlo1973 said:
No such thing as "16.4", it's called The Hundred.

It's still cricket - just a different form of it. Fairly interesting as an experiment but I expect it to be dead within a few years.
Click to expand...
The terms are synonyms,both correctly refering to the number of legitimate deliveries per innings. PUrely personal view whether it's still cricket.
 
Parkside said:
The terms are synonyms,both correctly refering to the number of legitimate deliveries per innings. PUrely personal view whether it's still cricket.
Click to expand...

There are no such things as overs in The Hundred so calling it "16.4" is incorrect.

I don't like it as a form of the sport either but let's get our terminology right.
 
Darlo1973 said:
There are no such things as overs in The Hundred so calling it "16.4" is incorrect.

I don't like it as a form of the sport either but let's get our terminology right.
Click to expand...

Out of... Well, not interest but whatever it is they call the appeal of gawping at a car crash, what are they called in the 16.4 instead of overs? Or do they just bowl (or whatever they call it) 100 balls in an endless stream
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top