That's crazy, Sunderland up there with only Spurs (Davey Spurs), for social media. Well unofficial at least.that's what it says on here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's crazy, Sunderland up there with only Spurs (Davey Spurs), for social media. Well unofficial at least.that's what it says on here
Yeah but they're individual clubs, it's not a bunch of clubs that have one forum, they each have one forum for the club.According to my apostrophe guy:
"To show possession in the plural form, all you have to do is put an apostrophe after the s. For example: Girls — girls' (girl + s + apostrophe) Friend — friends' (friend + s + apostrophe)"
That's the worst thing about the forum imo but maybe they find sanctuary here I guess looking at it positively. All closet Sunderland fans.The almost unique thing about this forum is that supporters of other clubs can come on and coexist in a way that other forums don't, so long as they aren't total dickheads. We even have a few tame mags.
That's a good argument, I must admit.Yeah but they're individual clubs, it's not a bunch of clubs that have one forum, they each have one forum for the club.
Thanks lad.That's a good argument, I must admit.
1. It was wonderful at first and has expanded well too. E. G. Football separated from chat and other separations like politics.Serious question. All the links to other club's forums that are posted look like they're still in the 90s in terms of format etc. The mods on here aren't the best sometimes and ban for ridiculous reasons but overall I'd put RTG up against any other message board, football or otherwise.
Parsnip this attention seeking shite.
You've just described modern society. The lack of discussion and no one can have an opposing view, and one side has to be right rather than accepting that there can be two sides to every argument and not instantly dismissing the other. "water off a duck's" back has also, unfortunately, become a thing of the past online for the most part.1. It was wonderful at first and has expanded well too. E. G. Football separated from chat and other separations like politics.
I loved it at the start. An opportunity to discuss my club, its team and other fans. Plenty of light hearted and amusing conversations. That has changed with more angry and abusive thrusts.
The information on the board is invaluable.
Sadly I cancelled it twice as years rolled on because of things like disgusting language and abuse as well as cowardly attempts to chase members off the board.
14,000 active members tells me it has to be
And that's not counting the waiting list.mad that
It's not mate
Don’t post on there but enjoy reading it - friendly bunch.R/championship is pretty good
It's a good argument if you don't mind being wrong. You were right first time Scotty. "Sites" is plural. If you you inverted the comment to avoid the apostrophe, you would write "the sites of other clubs." Only a maniac would say "the sites of other club."That's a good argument, I must admit.
Parsnip was the word that came to mind before I even opened the thread. I've been parsnipped for far, far less.Parsnip this attention seeking shite.
Fair point and a perfect illustration of how good the forum is and why you shouldn't try to correct grammar post 12pm, apologies. "Name another football forum with such intellectual debate as RTG", perhaps a more accurate title to the thread.It's a good argument if you don't mind being wrong. You were right first time Scotty. "Sites" is plural. If you you inverted the comment to avoid the apostrophe, you would write "the sites of other clubs." Only a maniac would say "the sites of other club."
BTW I don't normally engage in grammar pedantry, but I can't abide somebody being a grammar pedant when they are absolutely wrong (OP not you).