The Butcher
Striker
And have replacement lined up signed before selling
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Bid rejected for Clarke
- Thread starter Hugh Gains
- Start date
I would want it all up front, rather than making it easy for another club with add ons. If they really want him splash the cash.
I would prefer that we keep him though.
Mackemansj1
Striker
I'd want both, why shouldn't we be the ones taking the piss for a change. You want him we want big money with add-ons. We don't need to sell take clubs eyes out were due doing it for a change.
We are building a great young team and need to keep our main stars unless the offer is out of this world.
GBSAFC
Striker
It's f***ing speculative horseshit.... RR would be embarrassed if they shat out that
D
Deleted member 52509
Guest
So he’s contracted until 2026 -and four prem clubs are interested -safc in the box seat ( for once )
Exactly. It's either Clarke staying, or he goes for the highest transfer fee the club has ever received.
hank williams
Striker
Every other other article I’ve read has said the club are working on a deal for JC
to ward off interest since the first bid came in
£30 million for Pickford
wrighty
Striker
What a shit article. Sources say he is expected to be sold then later says we’re offering him new terms to get him to stay….
Rangers 
He's worth more than their entire squad.
He's worth more than their entire squad.
hank williams
Striker
He’d be better off staying with us than gan up thereRangers
He's worth more than their entire squad.
Scootsie
Striker
Rangers
He's worth more than their entire squad.
They genuinely don’t have the money to be even mentioned in the conversation.
Did we really get that for Pickford? I seen a lot of different numbers being quoted at the time.
hank williams
Striker
That’s the fee I remember quoted says £25 million rising to £30 with add ons here
Everton
2017–18 season
On 15 June 2017, Pickford signed for Premier League club
You must be logged on to see external links
on a five-year contract. The initial fee of £25 million, with the possibility of rising to £30 million in add-ons, made him
You must be logged on to see external links
at the time, the most expensive British goalkeeper of all time and will make him Everton's second most expensive signing, pending add-on payments,
You must be logged on to see external links
as is currently the club's most expensive signing with £40 million plus add-on payments. Pickford made his league debut for Everton on 12 August 2017, when his club beat 1–0 at Goodison Park. At the conclusion of his first season, he was named Everton's Player of the Season, along with numerous other club accolades.
Last edited:
gipetto
Striker
Thought the same
feels good doesn't it?
Vauxie
Striker
Not sure was a while back
I remember between 23/25m.
Ah well, my comment still stands on Clarke being our next highest then. That should be the aim when we're happy to keep him.
The Situation
Striker
These types of articles don't appear by accident by the way.
The club will be leaking stuff to them so that the reaction isn't as bad when he is sold.
Clubs do it all the time. West Ham have been at it with Rice for weeks now.
The club will be leaking stuff to them so that the reaction isn't as bad when he is sold.
Clubs do it all the time. West Ham have been at it with Rice for weeks now.
hank williams
Striker
Mowgli
Striker
Selling him isn't necessarily the wrong decision either. It depends how much its for.
