• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Ivan Toney


Is the 232 charges or something mean hes placed 232 bets on football games........hes certainly been grassed up by someone working for the Bookmakers.....is that not breach of confidentiality i thought but then ive just read Terms and Conditions on William Hill site and they are allowed to snitch to Football authorities if they suspect a player is betting....strange on this
 
columbo70 said:
Is the 232 charges or something mean hes placed 232 bets on football games........hes certainly been grassed up by someone working for the Bookmakers.....is that not breach of confidentiality i thought but then ive just read Terms and Conditions on William Hill site and they are allowed to snitch to Football authorities if they suspect a player is betting....strange on this
Click to expand...
Must have finally won the 232nd bet :lol:
 
columbo70 said:
Is the 232 charges or something mean hes placed 232 bets on football games........hes certainly been grassed up by someone working for the Bookmakers.....is that not breach of confidentiality i thought but then ive just read Terms and Conditions on William Hill site and they are allowed to snitch to Football authorities if they suspect a player is betting....strange on this
Click to expand...

I'd imagine he's decided to cough up and spill the beans rather than try to ride it out and possibly get a bigger ban
 
William Hill Terms and Conditions.....this must be it

Prohibited Practices
Rule 10.1.10. place a bet (including on behalf of a third party) in breach of any rules of a sports governing body (including, without limitation, any rules on betting or misuse of inside information relevant to a sports governing body), other professional body of which you (or the relevant third party) are a member or your employer (or the employer of the relevant third party);
 
Wonder what his fav type of bet was ?

I have a feeling it’s not a 5p patent for some reason
columbo70 said:
William Hill Terms and Conditions.....this must be it

Prohibited Practices
Rule 10.1.10. place a bet (including on behalf of a third party) in breach of any rules of a sports governing body (including, without limitation, any rules on betting or misuse of inside information relevant to a sports governing body), other professional body of which you (or the relevant third party) are a member or your employer (or the employer of the relevant third party);
Click to expand...
One more question
 
Lo Ursem said:
Football is hypocritical. Betting companies were allowed shirt sponsorship.

Why ?
Click to expand...
Because if fans are to believe , they don’t need millionaires like Toney betting on games he has knowledge of

It’s a terrible offence and I know it goes on
ajthemackem said:
Because a player can influence a game, and if he has reason to want to it's a clear conflict. Like I think it was Merson putting the ball out of play from a kick off because he'd bet on it.
Click to expand...
Le tissier that one
 
Ghfd said:
Because if fans are to believe , they don’t need millionaires like Toney betting on games he has knowledge of

It’s a terrible offence and I know it goes on

Le tissier that one
Click to expand...
That's the badger, I was torn between them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top