• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Glamorgan v Durham


You must be logged on to see external links


Bushnell injured apparently. You would think Trev and McKinney are the ones to miss out in the 13 man squad
 
Last edited:
Borthwick in the match preview
“Matt said that Marnus is one of his best mates. When Kuhney signed, Marnus gave him a notebook on every county cricketer".
Presumably it doesn't include his Glamorgan teammates😀
 
Glamorgan win the toss and put us into bat

Two changes from last week - Carse and Trevaskis in for Bushnell and Potts (Cheers ECB). Interesting to see us go with 2 spinners and 3 seam bowling attack
 
Stream is almost unwatchable. Glamorgan should be embarrassed how shit this is.
Lees gone LBW. Looked a poor decision according to Marty.
 
Last edited:
Ghfd said:
This is the bad side of central contracts

I think Anderson, Broad, Robinson, archer, wood are all ahead of Potts for Australia and that’s not including stokes bowling

Potts should be playing these games.
Click to expand...
It's almost like they don't want Durham to get out of Division 2....
 
Ghfd said:
Ftecb pulling Potts out is ridiculous as I would put canny money on he won’t play a test v Australia

theyll use him v Ireland though

the lad has barely bowled in six months
Click to expand...
I don't even know why they would take him as one of the 13 if they knew they couldn't bowl him. Surely the point of taking 13 is incase someone pulls up wit an injury during warm ups, so assuming that person wasn't Potts I'm stumped.
 
Neil Mallender, the latest wanker in a butchers coat who needs his eyes testing.
BatEleven said:
It's not a complete shocker mind. It may be going over the top but it's certainly not a shocker. Think Marty was going from Lees reaction.

On reflection, given Lees height, he probably is a bit unlucky.
Click to expand...

I’m sorry, but I strongly disagree. It was an absolute disgrace. It’s hit him almost ABOVE the pad whilst he’s on his tiptoes. The ball was already bail height and had another foot and a half to travel.
Bri said:
I don't even know why they would take him as one of the 13 if they knew they couldn't bowl him. Surely the point of taking 13 is incase someone pulls up wit an injury during warm ups, so assuming that person wasn't Potts I'm stumped.
Click to expand...

Maybe they didn’t, could’ve been a bit of skullduggery to keep the opposition guessing 🤷‍♂️
chopsfc007 said:
Everything isn't an agenda against Durham
Click to expand...

True, 99% of things are though.
Ghfd said:
I read that yorkshire are struggling to get a loan to pay their staff.

remove international cricket then ?
Click to expand...

48 point deduction for Durham.
 
Last edited:
104/1 at lunch. I think we’d all have taken that at 11am.

The Glamorgan commentators don’t seem v impressed with Lloyd’s decision to put us in mind.
 
104 for 1 off 29 at lunch, having been inserted . I think we would have taken that

scotty 27 and jones 42 at the crease
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top