• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


DaveH said:
Computers are in on the lie. Remember a long way back where I said about my network fibres going across the county have a longer round trip time than those going across the city and again to those local? I can't remember which garbage excuse it was but along the lines of "globe mindset, you just think it is longer", actually now I type that, he said that I used different strength laser transceivers for the different lengths and that accounted for the speed difference. I explained we used the same type for all and not a specific one for each distance, and could even swap them about. I was wrong and ignorant, being a successful network engineer and all that, he was right, being a painter and decorator who wouldn't be able to pick a fibre optic transceiver out of a line up of gadgets.

Delusional.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but,
erm,

Water sticks to a Mexican hat. There, explain your way out of that one Einstein.
 
DaveH said:
Computers are in on the lie. Remember a long way back where I said about my network fibres going across the county have a longer round trip time than those going across the city and again to those local? I can't remember which garbage excuse it was but along the lines of "globe mindset, you just think it is longer", actually now I type that, he said that I used different strength laser transceivers for the different lengths and that accounted for the speed difference. I explained we used the same type for all and not a specific one for each distance, and could even swap them about. I was wrong and ignorant, being a successful network engineer and all that, he was right, being a painter and decorator who wouldn't be able to pick a fibre optic transceiver out of a line up of gadgets.

Delusional.
Click to expand...
You're just parroting what you've read in books geared to the global narrative. It's not your fault as most go with the flow and do not need to go deeper. It's fine because it does not make you a bad person not challenging set narratives, I mean why would you challenge when it's all laid on a plate for you. Newcastle Lad is as we have all witness a visionary with no comparison, an expert in every field and understands the absolute gunk of the global mindset and all known fields of expertise.

In all seriousness the people who develop all the fake stuff must be so clever. It's odd to me that they are also the most two-faced bunch on the planet. I wonder how they are recruited into fake industries?
BigPete said:
Those fibre cables are really just audio ones mate.

Light is sound remember
Click to expand...
When using my headphones and I actually hearing light?
DaveH said:
Good point. Why do I pay fibre contractors thousands when I could just run some twin core speaker cable?
Click to expand...
sound/light is instant. you've been wasting loads of money for your firm. I wouldn't tell them as you might get the sack.
 
Last edited:
DaveH said:
Good point. Why do I pay fibre contractors thousands when I could just run some twin core speaker cable?
Click to expand...
It all makes sense now as well hidden in plain site.

Have those CAT cables and the higher number the higher the speed and bandwidth.

Same thing works with actual cats. 8 cats will make more noise than 7 and 6 cats will he even less noise.

They've been fooling us with word trickery 🤯
payne said:
When using my headphones and I actually hearing light?
Click to expand...

Seems so
 
Last edited:
Ghfd said:
Has Newcastle lad had a Big Bang yet?
Click to expand...
On the head
Just joking tbf apart from when comes across as a condescending bell on this thread doesn't seem a bad person.

I still don't know for sure if he honestly believes this or is just on the biggest wind up ever with loads of free time.

Either way been loads of good informative stuff posted in this thread and have enjoyed it
You must be logged on to see external links

Sky clear so far let's hope stays that's way and no clouds
 
Last edited:
I wonder why this secondary reflection back on itself and cancelling itself out (something that nobody can ever demonstrate in a lab environment), is slightly different depending on your location. A projection onto a dome would give the same amount of coverage for everyone. Does anyone think that this theory might be bollocks?
 
nahwee said:
Are you seriously suggesting this doesn’t happen?
Click to expand...
No, I'm asking for proof that it happens how you think it happens. Can you?
The Snockerty Friddle said:
He knows it happens, he just wants you to somehow demonstrate that as a fact in type on a message board with nothing but words and personal experience. It's the only way he can feel he's won an argument.
Click to expand...
But this is the entire argument. I'm asked to provide stuff so I'm asking for proof that what happens is from a spinning global perspective.
You can spend as much time as you want to offer the above but you know it's been offered based on a story and nothing else.
Hend79 said:
He will only ever be convinced if you have witnessed everything yourself otherwise you are relying on someone else telling you it happens. By his logic, Ive never seen a Polar Bear therefore they dont exist as I cant show a picture of me next to one.
Click to expand...
And theoretically, if I'd never seen one then I could offer up they don't exist and ask for proof, which would be offered. The issue here is there's nothing offered as proof for a spinning globe, just plenty of stories adhered to that it exists, yet nobody can prove it.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Still wouldn't be convinced because he'd have to witness it all himself.
Click to expand...
Just something, not all.
Pink Panther said:
You lost.
Click to expand...
Lost what?
BigPete said:
Wonder if he knows binary, html, java, c++ all the various things that allow computers and the Internet to run that he spouts his shite on..

If he doesn't then how does this magic stuff work? Is he dining from a platter?
Click to expand...
Indeed. I dine from the platter too. I can accept many things offered, as I've regularly said.
But even so, it can still be questioned.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
And theoretically, if I'd never seen one then I could offer up they don't exist and ask for proof, which would be offered. The issue here is there's nothing offered as proof for a spinning globe, just plenty of stories adhered to that it exists, yet nobody can prove it.
Click to expand...
Yes they can and it has.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Easy to say, hard to prove. I've never seen you offer any proof just as I've never seen anyone else, which is to be expected and for good reason.
We don't live on a spinning globe in a space vacuum.
Click to expand...
Every single international flight plan is based upon the great circle.

The calculations involved in producing such flight plans, either manually or by computer, require the input of a value representing the radius of the globe.

This is an indisputable fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top