Nukehasslefan
Winger
You make massively strong cases for nothing.
It would be impossible for your moon to spin and offer what people see.
Last edited:
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
fyl2u
Striker
Someone clearly doesn't even understand how "spinning" works.
3.142
Striker
Asides from that being nonsense, you ignored (as expected) the question of why people further down the sombrero and away from the central projector see the reflection of the sun on the dome in this way compared to people further up and closer to it. Or are you saying they don't and it is all made up?
Yes, plenty of proof.
Yes there is.
What doesnt exist? The flight plan from London to Sydney? Sydney or London itself?
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
When you claim that the moon is a reflection of the sun, yet it somehow moves over and around the sky at an entirely different speed to the sun, whilst giving a very convincing impression of a sphere in orbit around the Earth, I don’t really need to make the case.
nahwee
Winger
Not according to my spirit level.
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Shave a couple of light years off the end to calibrate it.
nahwee
Winger
I wasn’t referring to the moon spinning, I was referring to the image of the moon being inverted when being observed from one place on the earth compared to being observed from another place on earth.
Is it possible to explain that. The image must rotate, top to bottom, surely?
DaveH
Striker
So what was your experiment and what did it show?
My data shows a pressure change, but not connected to tide times in any way.
Aye, one absolute loon believes we live under a dome where a central projector (who no one has ever seen) projects images of the sun, moon and stars onto the dome, making us believe we live on a spinning globe orbiting a sun. He then proceeds to tell everyone they are wrong when they prove that we do in fact live on a globe.how the hell has this reached 842 pages? Can anyone summarise ?
When he is asked for proof he doesnt have any and instead tells us to do our own research.
I think that about covers it
Logon or register to see this image
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Lots of things apparently don't exist, things like gravity, East and West, the entire southern hemisphere and for some reason pulling. The Sun is a reflection on a shiny dome, the moon is just a reflection of the sun and comets and meteors are little bits of the dome falling off.how the hell has this reached 842 pages? Can anyone summarise ?
The globe is a lie perpetrated to hide the existence of rivers of silver and gold which flow over and around the area we knew as the north pole where lies a projector which is the source of what we foolishly think of as the Sun, Moon and stars, but nobody knows any of that because it's way too cold for man or machine to exist there.
None of us actually know anything, we just repeat our pre-programmed narrative for fear of ridicule.
DaveH
Striker
Pulling didn't exist for me in my awkward teen years, and has been voided for the last 25 years since meeting the missus. So I can understand the belief that it doesn't exist.
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
You didn't miss as much as you may have thought because sucking doesn't exist either.
We covered this 11 months ago.
From this post Put a flat earthier into space onwards for the next page or so, i show you that pressure out at sea is no different to pressure on land and i also add in tide times which vary down the east coast yet pressure 350 mile out at sea doesn't change in relation to the tides
Last edited:
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Should also be noted that the magical projector is a naturally occurring thing which knows when you're looking at the sky and from where, and adjusts the projection accordingly so that you always get to see the sky as if you lived on a spinning globe in orbit around the sun which is clearly preposterous because we live as everyone knows on a git massive lemon squeezer.how the hell has this reached 842 pages? Can anyone summarise ?
DaveH
Striker
Things have changed since then:
Put a flat earthier into space
Well it is an invented fantasy you stick by and evidence against it is so easy to find. I'm not sure what else I'd call it. I think you're talking about your spinning globe in a space vacuum an d all the absolute gunk that goes with that.
www.readytogo.net
He now has experimental evidence to prove what he first thought. So all we need is details of those experiments and the results, then we can all get on board with the idea.
In many ways the idea is sound. For example if you get a bowl full of water and blow down on it, you will see an indentation on the surface of the water and naturally the edges will rise a very small amount to compensate. While a blowing blast straight down at the water would cause a number of local issues of wind hitting shipping and planes flying over, it doesn't need to be that strong. If you increased pressure a very small amount over a very large area it would have a similar effect. The effect on each individual molecule of water would be tiny, but the cumulative effect of something as big as the world's oceans then it starts to become significant. In this respect it is no different to the effect of gravity in the standard model of reality. That is a very small gravitational force over a hell of a lot of water.
The question is, is the pressure change something we can find evidence for or perform an experiment to measure. @Nukehasslefan claims he has this, so once he shares we can all take a serious look at this proposal.
So Nuke, what are your experiments?
Things have changed since then:
Post 16,725 "A musing and what I have to push me that way is my own experiments"Put a flat earthier into space
Well it is an invented fantasy you stick by and evidence against it is so easy to find. I'm not sure what else I'd call it. I think you're talking about your spinning globe in a space vacuum an d all the absolute gunk that goes with that.
He now has experimental evidence to prove what he first thought. So all we need is details of those experiments and the results, then we can all get on board with the idea.
In many ways the idea is sound. For example if you get a bowl full of water and blow down on it, you will see an indentation on the surface of the water and naturally the edges will rise a very small amount to compensate. While a blowing blast straight down at the water would cause a number of local issues of wind hitting shipping and planes flying over, it doesn't need to be that strong. If you increased pressure a very small amount over a very large area it would have a similar effect. The effect on each individual molecule of water would be tiny, but the cumulative effect of something as big as the world's oceans then it starts to become significant. In this respect it is no different to the effect of gravity in the standard model of reality. That is a very small gravitational force over a hell of a lot of water.
The question is, is the pressure change something we can find evidence for or perform an experiment to measure. @Nukehasslefan claims he has this, so once he shares we can all take a serious look at this proposal.
So Nuke, what are your experiments?
I know your rouse
Unfortunately, so does flat brain.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Aye, and it's not me.
If you're standing in a circle looking outward you'll see the moon's reflection, let's say, face up on the part you are on. As that moon moves over and around that circle, it will go upside down, and people on that other part of the circle will see it upside down looking outwards.
You wouldn't get anything like it on a fantasy spinning globe with a fantasy spinning moon.
Your Earth diameter doesn't exist.
Last edited:
