• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


The Snockerty Friddle said:
That is exactly what it does

Because see above...

Measured by who? Who supplies the data for those who publish tides? The same people who hide the rivers of gold etc?
Click to expand...
It will be the same people who we've just found out are already mapping the ice wall circumference and potentially creating artificial climates to combat the big freeze of the area no man or machine can bypass.
 
DaveH said:
But lets be clear, this pressure wave of which you speak that is strong enough to cause pressure on the oceans to push a tide, can not be detected by any known means?

For example I live half a mile from the sea, it is low tide at the moment and the difference between high tide and low tide today is about 4 meters. Yet none of my pressure meters have ever detected this pressure wave strong enough to displace 4 meters of coastal water. Why is that?
Click to expand...
Even more incredible, this pressure wave is strong enough to move the vast bodies of water that are the seas and oceans, but miraculously leave smaller bodies, such as lakes unmoved. Or maybe we’ve been looking at lakes through the wrong end of the telescope and in fact on Nukehasslefanworld they are bigger than seas etc.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
You didn't help your cause by mentioning planes adjusting for global curvature.
I thought you may have gotten a pm to say "shhh."



Just look in the sky and have a good think about Earth and it may offer you things that open your mind. It may not but then again that's entirely up to you and has no bearing on me.

My potential diameter of Earth isn't your story of Earth diameter. You must have missed me telling you this, but here it is again.
Click to expand...
That is how it works though.

Ive looked at the sky, no magical light show dome there Im afraid. Just lots of stars billions of miles away, the moon and the other planets in our Solar system.

There is no "potential" diameter, there is an actual diameter though of 7915.5 miles. The distance of London to Sydney, in case you had forgot, is 10553 miles. That doesnt work on a flat Earth with only a diameter of 7915.5 miles, you cant explain that as you dont have any evidence or proof of what you are saying. Whereas what we are saying has been proven and documented a million times, you are a condescending arrogant liar who is the most clueless person on this board, in fact not just on this board :lol:
Nukehasslefan said:
I can't give you anything about that because I haven't been there, obviously.
Click to expand...
So why are you believing something what others have said? Using your own logic if you cant prove it yourself then its not true. So not only are you a condescending liar but also a hypocrite too :lol:
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
You're talking about a moving tide. There will be pressure variations but they will be a minor build.

If you look at a tide you'll notice it gains over many hours, not just one immediate water metre change in an instance.
Click to expand...
Wrong. Like I said, I can see over the last 2.5 days, pressure dropped from 1015pa, down to a low of 1001pa around 7am this morning, and has gone back up to 1003pa. This is entirely consistent with data reported from various weather sites, so I'm fairly confident my sensors are accurate. In addition, I have multiple sensors and they all show the same, which helps validate against a faulty sensor.

These report down to 0.01pa (I've rounded up my measurements above for clarity). Basic physics says that the pressure due to fluid is equal to the mass divided by the area. We are measuring air pressure, but lets put into context what 0.01pa is on the palm of your hand. Lets imagine I draw a square in the palm of my hand, 2cm by 2cm. That gives an area (assuming you believe in area) of 0.02m x 0.02m = 0.0004 m squared.

If pressure is mass (using the conventional definition of mass used by the rest of humanity except yourself, this is not nuke-mass so please do not get confused) divided by area, then mass is pressure times by area. So 0.01pa is 0.01 * 0.0004 giving a mass of 0.00004 Newtons.

1 Newton is 0.1019716 kg, so the smallest pressure difference I can detect is the same as 0.000004087 kg of water in a 2x2cm square on the palm of my hand. Or 0.004g, or 0.004ml of water.#

Basically if there is a pressure wave causing these tides, then as it is not detected by my sensor, the pressure must be less than one drop of fine water mist landing in the palm of my hand. Yet it can move the oceans.

This pressure wave is also not detected by sophisticated instruments who publish data and has never been reported by anyone anywhere.

Your magic pressure wave does not exist I'm afraid. And before you retort with your default bollocks, no this is not my mindset thinking the world is a globe, this is looking at raw data and saying "Hey look, you dreamed this up one afternoon, but the simplest bit of investigation into any sort of data shows it is not real". We have in your head vs proven reality.,

You made it up, you are talking bollocks. There is no pressure wave sweeping over the planet like clockwork.

We can add this to your 2d map and the evidence of having done any experiment as something which you just can not offer any evidence of.

Fail
 
DaveH said:
Wrong. Like I said, I can see over the last 2.5 days, pressure dropped from 1015pa, down to a low of 1001pa around 7am this morning, and has gone back up to 1003pa. This is entirely consistent with data reported from various weather sites, so I'm fairly confident my sensors are accurate. In addition, I have multiple sensors and they all show the same, which helps validate against a faulty sensor.

These report down to 0.01pa (I've rounded up my measurements above for clarity). Basic physics says that the pressure due to fluid is equal to the mass divided by the area. We are measuring air pressure, but lets put into context what 0.01pa is on the palm of your hand. Lets imagine I draw a square in the palm of my hand, 2cm by 2cm. That gives an area (assuming you believe in area) of 0.02m x 0.02m = 0.0004 m squared.

If pressure is mass (using the conventional definition of mass used by the rest of humanity except yourself, this is not nuke-mass so please do not get confused) divided by area, then mass is pressure times by area. So 0.01pa is 0.01 * 0.0004 giving a mass of 0.00004 Newtons.

1 Newton is 0.1019716 kg, so the smallest pressure difference I can detect is the same as 0.000004087 kg of water in a 2x2cm square on the palm of my hand. Or 0.004g, or 0.004ml of water.#

Basically if there is a pressure wave causing these tides, then as it is not detected by my sensor, the pressure must be less than one drop of fine water mist landing in the palm of my hand. Yet it can move the oceans.

This pressure wave is also not detected by sophisticated instruments who publish data and has never been reported by anyone anywhere.

Your magic pressure wave does not exist I'm afraid. And before you retort with your default bollocks, no this is not my mindset thinking the world is a globe, this is looking at raw data and saying "Hey look, you dreamed this up one afternoon, but the simplest bit of investigation into any sort of data shows it is not real". We have in your head vs proven reality.,

You made it up, you are talking bollocks. There is no pressure wave sweeping over the planet like clockwork.

We can add this to your 2d map and the evidence of having done any experiment as something which you just can not offer any evidence of.

Fail
Click to expand...
Not a fail.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Not a fail.
Click to expand...
I’ll believe you..
‘Seriously, for a moment, tell us how you managed to shake yourself free of the shackles of what I’ll call “conventional thinking” Did you have a damascene moment, or was it more gradual, and what pointed you in the direction of your theories?
0verlord44 said:
That is not

no now thats obviously CGI. Just look at the… erm… er…

Na i wont belittle Eugene Cernan like, the man was a legend
Click to expand...
That’s Freddie Flintoff, innit?
 
Bearing in mind that most modern day computers share components or ideas with the Apollo Guidance Computer, this is all just a little bit daft isnt it?

Or were there powerful enough computers to create HD images of fakery in 1966?.
 
Married to a mackem said:
I’ll believe you..
‘Seriously, for a moment, tell us how you managed to shake yourself free of the shackles of what I’ll call “conventional thinking” Did you have a damascene moment, or was it more gradual, and what pointed you in the direction of your theories?
Click to expand...
Cheap vodka and turps cocktails. Vurps or Turdka.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It's pretty clear.
Just go walking on the beach and follow the tide out.
Then turn around and see how far you walked down a gradient.
There's the simplest form.
Click to expand...
Hmm the thing is when I was in Cuba the beach actually faces the so called North Pole and indeed it sloped down into the sea.
In fact on Gran Canaria beaches on opposite sides of the island both sloped down into the sea so how does that prove your overall gradient in one direction.
You say you've observed it under the sea so you must have an idea of the actual gradient or are we saying we should use the beach to the sea as a rough idea, as that's a fairly steady 1 in 20 if you use Roker as an example, I'd much rather use your knowledge than guess though, so very roughly what do you estimate it at saying as you have been under the sea to observe it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top