Put a flat earthier into space

[SYB_DC]

Horizontally, yes.

It depends on how each person wants to look at it.

No need for any apologies. Just keep to your narrative.

Pilots know they fly over level, not curvature.

You do know you can circumnavigate a circle, right?

Yes, but only between one set of points - the rim of the circle. The Earth has been circumnavigated in a wide array of ways, including via the poles, which I take it is something you believe is impossible because I believe your model inherently holds that there is no South Pole.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Aren't we all?

When it's fact based, peer reviewed reality its only you who has a problem with that.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I know it’s off-topic, but tell us how you feel about the lizard people, while you’re at it.

You tell me, you are mentioning it.

You did say that actually.......

No, I didn't.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Yes, but only between one set of points - the rim of the circle. The Earth has been circumnavigated in a wide array of ways, including via the poles, which I take it is something you believe is impossible because I believe your model inherently holds that there is no South Pole.

No southern hemisphere

 

[legend7]

You tell me, you are mentioning it.

No, I didn't.

I've just attached your actual quote!

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Yes, but only between one set of points - the rim of the circle. The Earth has been circumnavigated in a wide array of ways, including via the poles, which I take it is something you believe is impossible because I believe your model inherently holds that there is no South Pole.

Stories or circular navigation.

When it's fact based, peer reviewed reality its only you who has a problem with that.

And when you can show me fact-based peer review then you have a strong argument.

I've just attached your actual quote!

Where?

 

[legend7]

Stories or circular navigation.

And when you can show me fact-based peer review then you have a strong argument.

Where?

16640 was a reply to your actual quote.
Go back a few and look at it

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

And when you can show me fact-based peer review then you have a strong argument.

Which you'd instantly dismiss and ignore because reasons.

 

[legend7]

14847 was your reply if you want to go back.. when questioned you also said your world could be 6 times the dia of earth

 

[Nukehasslefan]

16640 was a reply to your actual quote.
Go back a few and look at it

Nothing there.

Which you'd instantly dismiss and ignore because reasons.

You can sit and argue that reasoning all day and night if you want to but you're getting nowhere by doing it.

 

[legend7]

I've put 2 up actually, funny how you said back then your lemon squeezer maps and our maps were representative of your world now suddenly they aren't and could never be.....

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Nothing there.

You can sit and argue that reasoning all day and night if you want to but you're getting nowhere by doing it.

Are you under the impression that I think this goes anywhere? If I could take you into orbit and show you the planet spinning you'd still come up with some reason why it was fakery. As I've said before, this is entertainment only.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

14847 was your reply if you want to go back.. when questioned you also said your world could be 6 times the dia of earth

Nukehasslefan​

Winger​

• Sep 25, 2022
• Add bookmark
• #14,847

But you said our flat maps and your lemon squeezer was quite representative of what you think.

And I stand by it.

So how can they be appx in those positions yet only be 8000 miles apart on your 50000 miles wide lemon squeezer

Look back to what I said about 50,000 miles in diameter.




What are you trying to get at?

I've put 2 up actually, funny how you said back then your lemon squeezer maps and our maps were representative of your world now suddenly they aren't and could never be.....

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links

Earth.

 

[legend7]

[/HEADING][/HEADING]
[HEADING=3][HEADING=3]Nukehasslefan​

Winger​

• Sep 25, 2022
• Add bookmark
• #14,847

And I stand by it.

Look back to what I said about 50,000 miles in diameter.




What are you trying to get at?

But they aren't representative you say now, you say the landmasses are wrong and in the wrong places and distances don't work.
How can they be representative then?
OK so how many miles in dia appx for your world, ignoring the magic ice wall, seas and land only please.

 

[DaveH]

A few miles over 20000 miles say to the centre would look nothing like a lemon squeezer it would look completely flat

I love this one and the way it runs in loops.

The world is not a globe, water LEVEL proves it. All water must be at the same levels (for reasons unexplained)
So all coastlines are at the same height?
Yes
So you think the earth is flat?
No, I think it is a lemon squeezer.
So the coastlines are not at a different height?
They are on a gentle gradient
So the water isn't level?
Erm, it is indentations in the sea
So oceanic cartography is all a lie?
Yes
So all coastlines are at the same height but you don't think the world is flat?
Wibbley distraction

He has tied himself up in a flat knot. Either all the coastlines are on a level so the surface of his fantasy earth is flat and he is a fully fledged flat earther conspiracy theorist, or he believes the world is a different shape and his single experiment is blown out of the non-flat water required to make it work.

 

[Ageing Grey Mackem]

I love this one and the way it runs in loops.

The world is not a globe, water LEVEL proves it. All water must be at the same levels (for reasons unexplained)
So all coastlines are at the same height?
Yes
So you think the earth is flat?
No, I think it is a lemon squeezer.
So the coastlines are not at a different height?
They are on a gentle gradient
So the water isn't level?
Erm, it is indentations in the sea
So oceanic cartography is all a lie?
Yes
So all coastlines are at the same height but you don't think the world is flat?
Wibbley distraction

He has tied himself up in a flat knot. Either all the coastlines are on a level so the surface of his fantasy earth is flat and he is a fully fledged flat earther conspiracy theorist, or he believes the world is a different shape and his single experiment is blown out of the non-flat water required to make it work.

ON the subject of watery stuff, has he covered tides yet and how that works? Brief description of tides from t'web - "the rise and fall of seas caused by the combined effects of gravitational forces exerted by the Moon (and to a lesser extent, the Sun) also caused by the earth and moon orbiting one another." Ah...maybe the tide doesn't exist?

 

[BigPete]

I know it’s off-topic, but tell us how you feel about the lizard people, while you’re at it.

Met them once on DMT.

Scary buzzing bastards

 

[taipeisafc]

ON the subject of watery stuff, has he covered tides yet and how that works? Brief description of tides from t'web - "the rise and fall of seas caused by the combined effects of gravitational forces exerted by the Moon (and to a lesser extent, the Sun) also caused by the earth and moon orbiting one another." Ah...maybe the tide doesn't exist?

A pressure wave powerful enough to move water levels but not big enough to be picked up by any pressure transmitters we have at work.

 

[Ageing Grey Mackem]

A pressure wave powerful enough to move water levels but not big enough to be picked up by any pressure transmitters we have at work.

I have no idea what this means. Is it a dig?

 

[taipeisafc]

I have no idea what this means. Is it a dig?

Nope that is what his explanation was of tides, i dont understand it either. A massive regular pressure wave not picked up on any pressure measuring devices that somehow managed to cause tides in multiple places and differening heights (even though water is level)