• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

So which distances do you accept. You said you accepted regularly flown ones then suddenly changed your mind.
You went on about distances and offered your own based on your globe. I said I'll just accept them as being that and I'll offer a scale of 5 countries based on a circle.
I can't offer a 2d map of a 3d model and you know this.


You said known distances could work on a flat map as easily as they do on a globe, clearly that's not the case unless you can provide one?
Known distances, yes.
The problem is we don't know those distances on a globe because they are skewed. They do the opposite of what's being offered against a circle.
You're still not answering without stupidly being the major factor.
What results for your water test would you expect if the world was
a) flat
What it is now in terms of what we actually see and perceive.
b) a globe?
No water and us clinging on in a fantasy scenario, of course.
Basically, it cannot work and the spinning globe is utter nonsense.
The 1000mph part of your reply shows your total lack of understanding of the size of the world.
Oh really? Well, that may be down to it being nonsense.
If it's not a 1000 plus mph at your equator then don't offer it.
and some people are just stupid.
That depends. Stupid can be mixed up with simply being naive or disinterested in the following something.
 
Last edited:

Known distances, yes.
The problem is we don't know those distances on a globe because they are skewed. They do the opposite of what's being offered against a circle.
Jesus wept, how many times can it be explained to you? They arent skewed, they are actually recorded.

Ill ask again as you still havent explained it.

Earth diameter - 7915.5 miles
London to Sydney - 10553 miles.

That is only possible on a globe, not a flat Earth. Explain please.

Oh and while you are rummaging through that tiny brain maybe you can find some evidence of the magic dome light show :lol:
 
You went on about distances and offered your own based on your globe. I said I'll just accept them as being that and I'll offer a scale of 5 countries based on a circle.
I can't offer a 2d map of a 3d model and you know this.



Known distances, yes.
The problem is we don't know those distances on a globe because they are skewed. They do the opposite of what's being offered against a circle.
I'm not mentioning a globe for about the 50th time.
Known distances because they are travelled regularly by fellow humans and its generally quite important we know how far these places are apart!
So you don't think the distances between those places I listed are fairly accurate even though planes fly them, ludicrous.
 
Jesus wept, how many times can it be explained to you? They arent skewed, they are actually recorded.
Recorded on what?
Ill ask again as you still havent explained it.

Earth diameter - 7915.5 miles
London to Sydney - 10553 miles.
How about Earth not being 7915.5 miles in diameter?
Global-minded you are and I'm not. Hope this answers your question.
That is only possible on a globe, not a flat Earth. Explain please.
Of course, if that's what you've been told it is and you buy into it for no other reason than following mass opinion on the story.
Oh and while you are rummaging through that tiny brain maybe you can find some evidence of the magic dome light show :lol:
There's lots of it but it takes a person to look and delve a bit deeper.
Your global mind will never allow you to do that.
And sometimes stupidity is a choice.
I wouldn't say so.
It depends on how stupidity, naivety, and what people think of themselves, not just what others think of them.
It's not as done and dusted as people think.
I'm not mentioning a globe for about the 50th time.
You're still running with one or why would you be asking me to do a map of it in 2d?
Known distances because they are travelled regularly by fellow humans and its generally quite important we know how far these places are apart!
Of course, I agree for reaching destinations based on fuel, speed, and time ratios.

So you don't think the distances between those places I listed are fairly accurate even though planes fly them, ludicrous.
Not too sure to be fair. Most may be close but I don't think some are just as I don't believe all landmass is the size offered to us.
 
Last edited:
You're still running with one or why would you be asking me to do a map of it in 2d?

Of course, I agree for reaching destinations based on fuel, speed, and time ratios.


Not too sure to be fair. Most may be close but I don't think some are just as I don't believe all landmass is the size offered to us.
I'm not I'm running with it being impossible to make a flat map knowing known and travelled distances.
The one you said was easily possible but now say its not.
So of those travelled distances I gave you which ones are so massively wrong and more importantly why do you think they are wrong?
 
Recorded on what?

How about Earth not being 7915.5 miles in diameter?
Global-minded you are and I'm not. Hope this answers your question.

Of course, if that's what you've been told it is and you buy into it for no other reason than following mass opinion on the story.

There's lots of it but it takes a person to look and delve a bit deeper.
Your global mind will never allow you to do that.
On every navigation chart known to humankind,

It is 7915.5 miles in diameter. No you havent answered the question as you have not given any evidence the Earth is flat.

Nope, the numbers show the Earth is a globe.

There is none of it. If you think there is plenty then show it. You wont though as you are a condescending disrespectful liar.
 
I wouldn't say so.
It depends on how stupidity, naivety, and what people think of themselves, not just what others think of them.
It's not as done and dusted as people think.
Well you've been given more than enough to show you you're wrong and if you were actually seeking truth rather than settling for self confirmation you'd be rethinking your made up nonsense. You have chosen to ignore or reject it all without even trying. You have chosen to remain stupid.
 
I'm not I'm running with it being impossible to make a flat map knowing known and travelled distances.
Flat as in a pancake?

The one you said was easily possible but now say its not.
I said I could make one if I tweaked the map.
That means throwing your landmass around and out of your comfort zone you have it at.
I mean look at the projection maps.
In that configuration, you and I know you cannot offer what a globe offers when it's 2d.
You throw South Africa over one side and Australia over the other. It doesn't work even though the argument is the landmass is correct.

It's all guesswork with one entirely based on another and the globe takes precedence due to mass opinion and adherence to that setup.
It comes down to an argument of, nothing is where we think it is.

So of those travelled distances I gave you which ones are so massively wrong and more importantly why do you think they are wrong?
I think the landmass is all wrong if I'm being honest.
On every navigation chart known to humankind,

It is 7915.5 miles in diameter. No you havent answered the question as you have not given any evidence the Earth is flat.
Or maybe it's 25,000 miles in diameter to the dome foundation and 17,500 miles in diameter of known livable space.

Nope, the numbers show the Earth is a globe.
What numbers?
There is none of it. If you think there is plenty then show it. You wont though as you are a condescending disrespectful liar.
Don't waste too much energy on this stuff it weakens your argument.
 
Last edited:
Flat as in a pancake?


I said I could make one if I tweaked the map.
That means throwing your landmass around and out of your comfort zone you have it at.
I mean look at the projection maps.
In that configuration, you and I know you cannot offer what a globe offers when it's 2d.
You throw South Africa over one side and Australia over the other. It doesn't work even though the argument is the landmass is correct.

It's all guesswork with one entirely based on another and the globe takes precedence due to mass opinion and adherence to that setup.
It comes down to an argument of, nothing is where we think it is.


I think the landmass is all wrong if I'm being honest.
We all know flat versions don't work, because the earth isn't flat, that's the point!
Nobody with half a brain thinks any flat map represents the earth accurately, Jesus is it finally sinking in.
So if the earth is indeed flat why do you think nobody can produce a flat map mark some measured distances on and prove everyone who believes in a globe map wrong, I'll tell you why... .... it can't be done.
We all know that south africa and Australia aren't that far apart really (6000 miles) you're the one that thinks they are on the opposite side of a lemon squeezer.
 
Well you've been given more than enough to show you you're wrong and if you were actually seeking truth rather than settling for self confirmation you'd be rethinking your made up nonsense. You have chosen to ignore or reject it all without even trying. You have chosen to remain stupid.
Then use this time to reflect and pay no more attention to me. Unless of course, you'd rather just spend the rest of your time calling me stupid and whatnot which you're more than entitled to do and I'm ok with it.
As I said to Hendo, it weakens what little argument you have.
 
Then use this time to reflect and pay no more attention to me. Unless of course, you'd rather just spend the rest of your time calling me stupid and whatnot which you're more than entitled to do and I'm ok with it.
As I said to Hendo, it weakens what little argument you have.
End of thread. Prophet has spoken. Smartest man to have ever lived has just won the argument,
 
Or maybe it's 25,000 miles in diameter to the dome foundation and 17,500 miles in diameter of known livable space.


What numbers?

Don't waste too much energy on this stuff it weakens your argument.
Its not.

The actual recorded numbers that have been known for thousands of years.

It doesnt. It batters you into submission and makes you look more of a fool than you already have yourself you condescending disrespectful liar.
 
Then use this time to reflect and pay no more attention to me. Unless of course, you'd rather just spend the rest of your time calling me stupid and whatnot which you're more than entitled to do and I'm ok with it.
As I said to Hendo, it weakens what little argument you have.
What weakens the argument is ignoring everything people have told you, dismissing their facts and even denying they were ever given.
Considering the length of time you've been here dismissing pretty much everyone as misguided sheep who are unable to think for themselves, being called stupid is pretty mild dont you think? And to be fair, your entire story (it doesn't qualify as a theory) is monumentally stupid.
 
What weakens the argument is ignoring everything people have told you, dismissing their facts and even denying they were ever given.
Considering the length of time you've been here dismissing pretty much everyone as misguided sheep who are unable to think for themselves, being called stupid is pretty mild dont you think? And to be fair, your entire story (it doesn't qualify as a theory) is monumentally stupid.
He doesn't even accept first-hand knowledge at this point from the people on the thread who work in industry. What first-hand knowledge is the response? He doesn't accept anybody knows anything. It's truly bizarre.

He's somehow brainwashed himself into thinking he is of unmatched intellect. It's crazy.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top