SYB_DC
Striker
This may be the greatest interrogatory sentence ever composed in the English language.So you think a railway line offers a full-on landmass of Australia?
Especially after the bonus points for use of Nukey's favorite verb. Bravo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This may be the greatest interrogatory sentence ever composed in the English language.So you think a railway line offers a full-on landmass of Australia?
But you could go and see it.Nope, I know how it works. Also, by your logic I havent seen the Eiffel Tower with my own eyes therefore it doesnt exist![]()
And yet here you are trying like hell to argue your points with me.You're so thick it's unbelievable.
You used to have some interesting if bizzare points but the absurd amount of well known and recorded info you are denying now just makes you a laughing stock tbh.And yet here you are trying like hell to argue your points with me.
It makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Of course, it appears curved. That's why the distances are wrong and that's why a real straight line is correct.Why don't you just hold up a sign saying "I DON’T UNDERSTAND" it would be simpler. A straight line point to point flight across a globe, when shown on a 2d map will appear curved.
I know what I'm saying.That's at least three times it's been explained now, do you still say it hasn't?
It only curves in the minds of those who were sold that story.That one simple thing that you can not understand or prove. It curves.
I know a few facts and those few facts destroy a spinning globe.Then you know no facts at all.
How could a straight line be correct on the map you disagree with?Of course, it appears curved. That's why the distances are wrong and that's why a real straight line is correct.
That's nice, because you appear to know nothing much elseI know what I'm saying.
You need helpIt only curves in the minds of those who were sold that story.
They just don't though do they? Not one single one of them. They're all bullshit.I know a few facts and those few facts destroy a spinning globe.
They fly the actual distances man and need these to be accurate for fuelling you absolute imbecile.Of course, it appears curved. That's why the distances are wrong and that's why a real straight line is correct.
Except pictures
Show me., footage
What about different seasons?, the different seasons
Aye, it would work brilliantly on a near circle but it would not really work on any spinning globe without silly manipulation without logical reason.the fact we can view stars in different positions throughout the year.
Rising or your ball spinning you towards it?The Sun rising at differing points on the horizon throughout the year, none of those facts though aye?
Water finding its own level is a fact. It's a simple fact that absolutely on its own, destroys the spinning globe model.Also, your fact isnt a fact, its something you have imagined in your head.
The paths look the way they do because the curvature ruse has to be kept up.I'm deliberately not stating any opinion. I asked you to explain to me why the paths look the way they do. You have the floor.
You feel free to laugh and point at my forum name whilst doing it if it helps you. But you're still at the exact point you started with, which is not knowing what Earth is because you are not in possession of any facts.You used to have some interesting if bizzare points but the absurd amount of well known and recorded info you are denying now just makes you a laughing stock tbh.
This is like the equivalent of a movie that cuts off after the first ten seconds. We're waiting for the plot: the why, the how, the who, the thick-necked hero blasting away at effeminate opponents in narrow ties with a gun the length of his arm, the explosions, the dense masses being offered to scale plates!The paths look the way they do because the curvature ruse has to be kept up.
Nope you are the one that keeps admitting you have no facts just musings.You feel free to laugh and point at my forum name whilst doing it if it helps you. But you're still at the exact point you started with, which is not knowing what Earth is because you are not in possession of any facts.
Your southern hemisphere is the major issue and you're claiming those flights are bang on.They fly the actual distances man and need these to be accurate for fuelling you absolute imbecile.
Not at all. I don't think they would fly any curve unless they need to detour or hitch a ride on the vortex, also known as your so-called global jetstream.Do you think they will fly a longer curve just for the crack.
Some distances will be spot on or close to it.Same as distances measured across countries by other means of transport.
It isn't an issue though that's the point, they all work on a globe map, to scale.Your southern hemisphere is the major issue and you're claiming those flights are bang on.
Why?
Just because?
Not at all. I don't think they would fly any curve unless they need to detour or hitch a ride on the vortex, also known as your so-called global jetstream.
Some distances will be spot on or close to it.
You'll find those in what they call the northern part.
The issue starts with the so-called southern part. the near-empty part of the supposed globe.
You have little clue about my musings.
You're struggling like hell.
Already did and anyone can do it.
Neither can you.
I mean all landmass unknown to us mere commoners.
You can say that but you cannot prove it.
So you think a railway line offers a full-on landmass of Australia?
If?
If you tie a string around a ball you can knot it to hold it.
You may as well say if you can fly a plane over your south pole and go over your north pole, you'll be headed back to your south pole.
It's so easy to say but you have absolutely no clue about the reality of any of it. You're absolutely 100% subservient to the stories.
Give me an example of circumnavigation of your globe.
From which point to point?
Has anyone ever foollowed a so-called star for 24,000 plus miles of so-called global circumnavigation?
You're not offering anything like a globe. You know this and so do I.
Nothing. Nothing has to be manipulated at all.What about different seasons?
Take a look at what has to be manipulated on a fictional globe to achieve seasons. It's laughably nuts.
It only works on a spinning globe without any manipulation whatsoever.Aye, it would work brilliantly on a near circle but it would not really work on any spinning globe without silly manipulation without logical reason.
Why say all that when sunrise works just fine?Light-year balls of fire. Hmmmmm.....never mind.
Rising or your ball spinning you towards it?
It's strange how it's the sun rising when you really should be saying the Earth is spinning you towards the big burning central sun as you also whizz around it at 66,000 mph. And so on and so on and blah blah blah.
It's a simple fact that if measured properly, which you have not, would demonstrate perfectly the curvature of the Earth. It's amazing that you are still using this as your crown jewel of so called proofs. You're so wrong it's almost as mental as thinking there's a git big projector responsible for the Sun, which is almost as mental as claiming the moon is just a reflection of the Sun.A great fictional story but that's all it is and ever will be.
Water finding its own level is a fact. It's a simple fact that absolutely on its own, destroys the spinning globe model.
Nah bollocks. Even you dont believe this shite.The paths look the way they do because the curvature ruse has to be kept up.
You really are proud of how stupid you have chosen to be aren't you?You feel free to laugh and point at my forum name whilst doing it if it helps you. But you're still at the exact point you started with, which is not knowing what Earth is because you are not in possession of any facts.
Only an issue on your flat world map, not on the globeYour southern hemisphere is the major issue and you're claiming those flights are bang on.
You're just doing this all for comic effect aren't you?Not at all. I don't think they would fly any curve unless they need to detour or hitch a ride on the vortex, also known as your so-called global jetstream.
Aye, for my very own Earth setup. I say time and again that I cannot offer direct proof for what I muse.Nope you are the one that keeps admitting you have no facts just musings.
Yes....none.I'm well aware of what facts we all have.
It isn't 3000 miles on my map. You decided to offer that based on what exactly?Why does it take over 11 hours to fly to south africa from the UK when it's only about 3000 miles away on your "map"
That depends on the plane or boat or car.Surely they will want to get there as quickly as possible.
Do you know how fast all planes fly? Like personally?Do they just fly very slowly?
They only work because they're made to work. It's on a platter for you.It isn't an issue though that's the point, they all work on a globe map, to scale.
They don't on a fantasy disc world
You were asked to provide it to scale.It isn't 3000 miles on my map. You decided to offer that based on what exactly?
I already did and I have seen none from your side to prove a spinning globe.![]()
But you can't actually provide details of any experiment, can you?
Keep trying.Or, can you clarify this, do you still think a short spirit level in the bath is sufficient to measure if the earth is flat or curved?
If you see it as a comic effect then run with it.Nothing. Nothing has to be manipulated at all.
It only works on a spinning globe without any manipulation whatsoever.
Why say all that when sunrise works just fine?
It's a simple fact that if measured properly, which you have not, would demonstrate perfectly the curvature of the Earth. It's amazing that you are still using this as your crown jewel of so called proofs. You're so wrong it's almost as mental as thinking there's a git big projector responsible for the Sun, which is almost as mental as claiming the moon is just a reflection of the Sun.
Nah bollocks. Even you dont believe this shite.
You really are proud of how stupid you have chosen to be aren't you?
Only an issue on your flat world map, not on the globe
You're just doing this all for comic effect aren't you?
I provided it to my scale.You were asked to provide it to scale.
Using arg to s.a as a base it works out at about 3000 miles on your map.
On my scale, it is closer to 6,600.You were asked to provide it to scale.
Using arg to s.a as a base it works out at about 3000 miles on your map.
He can't actually say why they don't work or what distances he doubts. He is just doubling down and screaming "they don't work".It isn't an issue though that's the point, they all work on a globe map, to scale.
They don't on a fantasy disc world
Actually closer to 7000 to be fair.I already did and I have seen none from your side to prove a spinning globe.
Keep trying.
If you see it as a comic effect then run with it.
I provided it to my scale.
On my scale, it is closer to 6,600.
Keep trying what? To guess your experiment? WTF? I can not imagine what insane musings are going on in your head.I already did and I have seen none from your side to prove a spinning globe.
Keep trying.
If you see it as a comic effect then run with it.
I provided it to my scale.
On my scale, it is closer to 6,600.
Of course you can't. Yours are in books.Keep trying what? To guess your experiment? WTF? I can not imagine what insane musings are going on in your head.
Did you?Err ok, did you balance a carrot on top of your TV?
I did and you saw it but you deny what your logic should tell you because the narrative does not offer you a way out of the box.No, erm how about you put details of your experiment on here that proves the earth is not a globe?
Plenty.There is no experiment is there?