Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

So in short, you can’t produce an experiment that proves the earth is flat/not a globe.

I can and have proved it's not a spinning lobe. Whether you believe that or not isn't my problem.

And, you can’t produce a 2d map of the world where you think you live in where the accepted and well traveled distances work.

Not with your southern hemisphere, no, but then again it's so sparse as to massively bring it into question, for obvious reasons.

Not having a good few weeks really.

I'm doing just fine and as strong as ever, if not stronger against the spinning globe.

 

[taipeisafc]

Remember his vortex that produced the focaults pendulum effect (drift of 360 degrees over 24 hours) well I had a quick go at working out what this would mean on a non rotating lemon squeezer earth. As the drift of 360 degrees is the same anywhere in the world it has to follow that the vortex must complete a 360 degree rotation around the central point every 24 hours. Well if we assume a 7500 mile radius earth (15000 mile diameter) then at 50% of the distance to the ice wall the vortex would be travelling at 981 miles/hour (mach 1.2 or thereabouts) to do a full rotation in 24 hours. If we assume this 50% is more or less the equator then as I have lived in Singapore I can confidently state that there were no close to 1000 mph winds at any time I lived there (even at 2500 miles radius the speed at 50% of the radius would be 327 mph)

I can and have proved it's not a spinning lobe. Whether you believe that or not isn't my problem.

I must have missed that - all I saw as gibberish about "water nails it" and some drivel about crosshairs on scopes. That isn't proof in any sense of the word.

 

[What A Waster]

Remember his vortex that produced the focaults pendulum effect (drift of 360 degrees over 24 hours) well I had a quick go at working out what this would mean on a non rotating lemon squeezer earth. As the drift of 360 degrees is the same anywhere in the world it has to follow that the vortex must complete a 360 degree rotation around the central point every 24 hours. Well if we assume a 7500 mile radius earth (15000 mile diameter) then at 50% of the distance to the ice wall the vortex would be travelling at 981 miles/hour (mach 1.2 or thereabouts) to do a full rotation in 24 hours. If we assume this 50% is more or less the equator then as I have lived in Singapore I can confidently state that there were no close to 1000 mph winds at any time I lived there (even at 2500 miles radius the speed at 50% of the radius would be 327 mph)


I must have missed that - all I saw as gibberish about "water nails it" and some drivel about crosshairs on scopes. That isn't proof in any sense of the word.

This vortex also doesn't disrupt atmospheric stacking either

 

[Nukehasslefan]

This vortex also doesn't disrupt atmospheric stacking either

It actually does.

 

[What A Waster]

It actually does.

Is this recorded anywhere?

 

[Pink Panther]

Flatties charter:

Never mind science,
or facts,
or common sense.

Just use words.
It doesn't matter whether they mean anything or not, but use plenty of words.
And remember the three most important words of all...

LOOK
AT
ME!

 

[payne]

Is this recorded anywhere?

It's a class theory the flat earth one. Make outlandish statements. Cant test anything. Fact.

 

[fyl2u]

I can and have proved it's not a spinning lobe. Whether you believe that or not isn't my problem.

No, you haven't.

Not with your southern hemisphere, no

Not with working distances to anywhere. At least you're half admitting it now.

, but then again it's so sparse as to massively bring it into question, for obvious reasons.

What reasons?

I'm doing just fine and as strong as ever, if not stronger against the spinning globe.

Only in your own deluded mind. Not a single person here has been convinced by your pseudo-scientific musings, flawed experiments and outright lies.

 

[DaveH]

I can and have proved it's not a spinning lobe. Whether you believe that or not isn't my problem.

Not with your southern hemisphere, no, but then again it's so sparse as to massively bring it into question, for obvious reasons.

I'm doing just fine and as strong as ever, if not stronger against the spinning globe.

Though in reality, you have not done anything to prove it have you? You have invented a fantasy world with no proof, doubted the real world, made up a load of non-sensical science and claimed it a job well done.

You have not done a single experiment that proves the world is not a globe. So far the only thing you have said you have done is:
- Put a spirit level in the bath, which will never be able to detect a curve unless it was hundreds of meters long
- Bend some twigs together for reasons unknown, but again would have to be hundreds of meters long to be meaningful.

Essentially you have cleaned a spirit level and constructed a small nest.

If you have actual experiments then I'd love to hear about them. Way back, you said you had done a lot with evacuation chambers, but failed to supply what you actually did and what sort of evacuation chamber you sourced. I'd love to hear about those.

Not sure what you are getting at with that thing about the southern hemisphere being so sparse. Are you suggesting the oceans are not that big or there are other unreported landmasses?

Remember his vortex that produced the focaults pendulum effect (drift of 360 degrees over 24 hours) well I had a quick go at working out what this would mean on a non rotating lemon squeezer earth. As the drift of 360 degrees is the same anywhere in the world it has to follow that the vortex must complete a 360 degree rotation around the central point every 24 hours. Well if we assume a 7500 mile radius earth (15000 mile diameter) then at 50% of the distance to the ice wall the vortex would be travelling at 981 miles/hour (mach 1.2 or thereabouts) to do a full rotation in 24 hours. If we assume this 50% is more or less the equator then as I have lived in Singapore I can confidently state that there were no close to 1000 mph winds at any time I lived there (even at 2500 miles radius the speed at 50% of the radius would be 327 mph)


I must have missed that - all I saw as gibberish about "water nails it" and some drivel about crosshairs on scopes. That isn't proof in any sense of the word.

Nice. Though he doesn't like it when Maths gets in the way

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I can and have proved it's not a spinning lobe. Whether you believe that or not isn't my problem.

You have not and cannot. You might have proved something to yourself but no one else.
Oh and having looked, I still see nothing from you on explaining the curved lines on 2d maps/flightpaths. I explained them twice and the second even included a link to the first. What do YOU think explains those curved lines?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's a class theory the flat earth one. Make outlandish statements. Cant test anything. Fact.

It's really strange and quite funny but the spinning globe is not only an outlandish theory, nothing can be tested with that to show any facts whatsoever..

Though in reality, you have not done anything to prove it have you? You have invented a fantasy world with no proof, doubted the real world, made up a load of non-sensical science and claimed it a job well done.

We can forget mine and we can just deal with not only doubting the spinning globe but knowing it to be utter gunk.

You have not done a single experiment that proves the world is not a globe.

Yes. Do I need to say it again?

So far the only thing you have said you have done is:
- Put a spirit level in the bath, which will never be able to detect a curve unless it was hundreds of meters long
- Bend some twigs together for reasons unknown, but again would have to be hundreds of meters long to be meaningful.

Essentially you have cleaned a spirit level and constructed a small nest.

Essentially I've shown the water to find its own level, not find it's own convex curvature.

If you have actual experiments then I'd love to hear about them.

You have but you choose to go with global curvature so really you're not hearing anything.

Way back, you said you had done a lot with evacuation chambers, but failed to supply what you actually did and what sort of evacuation chamber you sourced. I'd love to hear about those.

What would you like to know?
How do they work in reality?

Not sure what you are getting at with that thing about the southern hemisphere being so sparse. Are you suggesting the oceans are not that big or there are other unreported landmasses?

Oh, I believe there are plenty of unreported landmasses.

You have not and cannot. You might have proved something to yourself but no one else.

That's all I require.
What others take from it is not my concern.

Oh and having looked, I still see nothing from you on explaining the curved lines on 2d maps/flightpaths.

I certainly haven't had any explanation as to what they are from your side.

I explained them twice and the second even included a link to the first. What do YOU think explains those curved lines?

I don't think you have.

 

[legend7]

It's really strange and quite funny but the spinning globe is not only an outlandish theory, nothing can be tested with that to show any facts whatsoever..

We can forget mine and we can just deal with not only doubting the spinning globe but knowing it to be utter gunk.

Yes. Do I need to say it again?

Essentially I've shown the water to find its own level, not find it's own convex curvature.

You have but you choose to go with global curvature so really you're not hearing anything.

What would you like to know?
How do they work in reality?

Oh, I believe there are plenty of unreported landmasses.


That's all I require.
What others take from it is not my concern.

I certainly haven't had any explanation as to what they are from your side.

I don't think you have.

Embarrassing

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Embarrassing

I agree but to be fair I used to believe in a spinning globe too.

 

[Pink Panther]

I agree but to be fair I used to believe in a spinning globe too.

You still do.

 

[legend7]

I agree but to be fair I used to believe in a spinning globe too.

You even deny distances used daily man.
You don't have a single fact and keep changing your story to suit a new argument.
You haven't done a single experiment it's all just nonsense spinning around your head.
Bizarre behaviour now.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You even deny distances used daily man.

Aye, some.

You don't have a single fact and keep changing your story to suit a new argument.

I have one major fact. Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe.
You have no facts to back it up.

You haven't done a single experiment it's all just nonsense spinning around your head.

You are welcome to go with and mention this as many times as you feel the need.

Bizarre behaviour now.

To you, it's all bizarre because nothing suits you or others.
I wouldn't expect anything different.

 

[legend7]

Aye, some.

I have one major fact. Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe.
You have no facts to back it up.

Aye just the ones that don't work in your fantasy.
Even denying where Abu Dhabi was yesterday yet for some reason won't mark it on your disc world, if you're going to argue you have to at least have a valid argument, just making yourself look very silly now.
Known and travelled distances alone show that we can't live on a flat world.
What actual facts do you have? One day you say you have facts the next you say you only have musings and no facts, you're a compulsive liar, you're on own family think you're nuts, I think you may need some help fella.
Probably a canny bloke but you have a heed full of mad dogs shite as my Dad would say.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

That's all I require.
What others take from it is not my concern.

Then you have proved nothing. Not even to yourself. All you have done is fool yourself.

I certainly haven't had any explanation as to what they are from your side.

Blatant lie. I explained them to you this morning and included a link to the previous time too.

I don't think you have.

You know I have, you’re just avoiding saying why you think they're curved....for some reason.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Aye just the ones that don't work in your fantasy.
Even denying where Abu Dhabi was yesterday yet for some reason won't mark it on your disc world, if you're going to argue you have to at least have a valid argument, just making yourself look very silly now.

I certainly don't feel silly. I do feel very comfortable in my thoughts.
What you believe I look like or am is entirely your choice, obviously but you do understand it has no bearing on what I say or do.

Known and travelled distances alone show that we can't live on a flat world.

If they're all known and in what context they're known. The issue is, they aren't known by curvature and this is an extreme issue for global believers.

What actual facts do you have?

A few nailed-on facts that you obviously know so there's no need for me to offer them.
You possess zero facts for a spinning globe.

One day you say you have facts the next you say you only have musings and no facts,

No. I've always offered my musings as just that and never factual but you carry on trying to create your own belief system. It counts only for you and is of no consequence to me.

you're a compulsive liar

In your opinion.

, you're on own family think you're nuts,

Now you know my family. Fantastic.

I think you may need some help fella.

We all need some kind of help but you let me worry about mine and you worry about your own.

Probably a canny bloke but you have a heed full of mad dogs shite as my Dad would say.

Whatever you think I may be or probably could be or am, is your thought process. Either thought is all fine by me.

Then you have proved nothing. Not even to yourself. All you have done is fool yourself.

Blatant lie. I explained them to you this morning and included a link to the previous time too.

You know I have, you’re just avoiding saying why you think they're curved....for some reason.

Same again.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Same again.

Yeah, same old avoidance and distraction. You have no credible answers.