Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

Hi.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Nice try but this isn't what I'm offering and you know this. But feel free to carry on.

I know. What you're offering is entirely irrelevant to how measurements are made on a globe. You know this but it allows you to distract and divert doesn't it.

I'll make it simple again.
The shortest distance to any point is a straight and level line. Your globe does not and cannot offer it but a level can.

So what? When we're measuring the distance between cities and demonstrating that you cannot make a map which puts them in the correct relative positions the fact that they're closer by tunnel is of no consequence. The distances are measured over land. The land curves. The distances prove it.

So simple but the globe doesn't do simple. The globe does magical in terms of how people are coerced into believing they walk, sail, and fly over a convex curvature.

I'm getting the word......Bellendery

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I know. What you're offering is entirely irrelevant to how measurements are made on a globe. You know this but it allows you to distract and divert doesn't it.

It's not about distracting or diverting anything. It's all about what's offered against what is not factual and what's offered from the global side is absolutely not factual so I'm arguing from those points and it's blatantly obvious I'm going to be ridiculed for it by those who believe they live on a spinning ball and armed with everything they need to peruse to argue for it.

As simple as that really.

So what? When we're measuring the distance between cities and demonstrating that you cannot make a map which puts them in the correct relative positions the fact that they're closer by tunnel is of no consequence.

But they're not in their correct positions in the so-called southern hemisphere and this is why I've altered it.

The distances are measured over land. The land curves. The distances prove it.

It proves absolutely nothing.

I'm getting the word......Bellendery

Sniff.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

It's not about distracting or diverting anything.

Yes it is

It's all about what's offered against what is not factual

No it isn't

and what's offered from the global side is absolutely not factual

Yes it is

so I'm arguing from those points and it's blatantly obvious I'm going to be ridiculed for it by those who believe they live on a spinning ball and armed with everything they need to peruse to argue for it.

No, you were challenged to create a map showing cities in place with the correct distances between them. You know you cant do it so you've spent a couple of weeks going on about how they're closer in straight lines and bending sticks. You cant make the map, you and everyone else knows that and knows why.

As simple as that really.

But they're not in their correct positions in the so-called southern hemisphere and this is why I've altered it.

All cities are in their correct place. They're only in the wrong places if you try to make out they are on a flat Earth.

It proves absolutely nothing.

Known distances between multiple points definitely prove the shape of the surface they're on, but carry on arguing that they'd be closer if you tunnelled if that helps.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

No, you were challenged to create a map showing cities in place with the correct distances between them. You know you cant do it so you've spent a couple of weeks going on about how they're closer in straight lines and bending sticks. You cant make the map, you and everyone else knows that and knows why.

I did it and I placed landmass. It doesn't mean it is accurate but it also does not mean the one you offered is accurate, as a globe.
If you say the argument isn't about a globe then your map isn't from a global point of view...or is it? You decide.

 

[legend7]

But they're not in their correct positions in the so-called southern hemisphere and this is why I've altered it.

SO YOU CAN'T MAKE IT WORK WITH KNOWN DISTANCES!!!

 

[Nukehasslefan]

SO YOU CAN'T MAKE IT WORK WITH KNOWN DISTANCES!!!

Not in your southern hemisphere, no.

 

[DaveH]

Bend a stick and place the end on the ground in that bend. You know, like your supposed globe arc.
Now get the exact same-sized stick and place it at each end of the other stick and what will you find?
Yes, you'll find the level/straight stick has to be shortened to make it reach each end of the arced stick.

How long are these sticks of yours?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

How long are these sticks of yours?

Same size.

 

[DaveH]

I did it and I placed landmass. It doesn't mean it is accurate but it also does not mean the one you offered is accurate, as a globe.
If you say the argument isn't about a globe then your map isn't from a global point of view...or is it? You decide.

You failed to get anywhere close. A small margin of error can be put down to error when drawing free hand. But you were out by a long long way.

No flat earth (or not-globe) conspiracy theorist has ever produced a map that works with known distances. You have not improved that situation by drawing a broken map.

Same size.

Same size as what?

Are they 12cm long, perhaps the same size of a pencil? 2m long?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

How long are these sticks of yours?

Depends on how much he bends them

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You failed to get anywhere close. A small margin of error can be put down to error when drawing free hand. But you were out by a long long way.

Nah.

No flat earth (or not-globe) conspiracy theorist has ever produced a map that works with known distances.

That depends on what the known distances were marked on.
Certainly not a globe.

You have not improved that situation by drawing a broken map.

I didn't draw a broken map, I offered 5 points.

 

[payne]

he's always offering some newcastle lad, absolute bollocks

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Nah.

yeah

"No flat earth (or not-globe) conspiracy theorist has ever produced a map that works with known distances"
That depends on what the known distances were marked on.

No it doesn't, it's a fact. There is no flat Earth map that works whether it's drawn on paper or your arse, there is not one.

Certainly not a globe.

The only one that is accurate is on a globe.

I didn't draw a broken map, I offered 5 points.

You copied your UN logo map and used little circles for entire countries to avoid accuracy and still put Japan in the wrong place. You didn't draw a working map or anything close to one.

 

[legend7]

Not in your southern hemisphere, no.

It was your map not ours.
We just gave you known distances.
You still haven't shown your flightpath from uk to australia

 

[SYB_DC]

Let's hope they're not spinning.

Route?

Flightaware is not a difficult site to use. But since you can't seem to do it:

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[DaveH]

Nah.

That depends on what the known distances were marked on.
Certainly not a globe.

I didn't draw a broken map, I offered 5 points.

You drew 5 points which to scale didn't match well established distances travelled and measured regularly on planet earth. You failed.

This is because those distances don't work on a 2d earth. They do work on a globe because we live on a globe.

 

[DPTT]

I did it and I placed landmass. It doesn't mean it is accurate but it also does not mean the one you offered is accurate, as a globe.
If you say the argument isn't about a globe then your map isn't from a global point of view...or is it? You decide.

To be fair mate your attempt at a map was half arsed at best

If you fully believed in what you are saying then you would have provided something a lot more detailed. Problem with that is you cannot

 

[DaveH]

By the way @Nukehasslefan , you wanted flights on FlightRadar. Have a look at

You must be logged on to see external links

Currently in flight from New Zealand to South America. If you added New York to your map and drew a straight line between the two, it would go pretty close.

 

[payne]

By the way @Nukehasslefan , you wanted flights on FlightRadar. Have a look at

You must be logged on to see external links

Currently in flight from New Zealand to South America. If you added New York to your map and drew a straight line between the two, it would go pretty close.

obviously a NSA / CIA backed website to perpetuate the globe lie