payne
Striker
They are just studying something that appears to be one way but is in fact all fake stuff put their to fool ya. Like God putting fossils about the place.
Not to mention geologists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are just studying something that appears to be one way but is in fact all fake stuff put their to fool ya. Like God putting fossils about the place.
Not to mention geologists.
I already did and you can go and look up many many more.If it’s been done so many times surely you can show one of them on here?
What I said.Offering anything? What are you going on about?
Go and look.Please direct us to one.
What page and I will have a lookI already did and you can go and look up many many more.
What I said.
Go and look.
It isn't possible to turn a globe flat and keep it the same without tweaking it.Well last week you said it was not possible and a few of us have been asking.
I believe so, yes.So Archaeologists and Paleontologists are in on the big scam as well are they?
Everything decays so you'll have to elaborate.And chemists/ physicists on the basis of lead/ uranium atomic decay.
Maybe most of us are.In fact, just about everyone except Nukey would need to be in on it. He thinks he's in The Trueman Show.
I was reading a report the other day where geology studies have found evidence in rock sediment that the moon was closer a couple of million years ago, making much stronger and higher tides, but also that the earth rotated in around 13 hours. That ties in with evidence found by astronomers.
Not to mention geologists.
Finally, we got there. Yes you can't keep the same distances, you have to multiply them by a massive factor to make the world into a disc. We don't live on a disc and that is why no flat earth believer has produced a working map.It isn't possible to turn a globe flat and keep it the same without tweaking it.
It isn't possible to turn a globe flat and keep it the same without tweaking it.
I believe so, yes.
Everything decays so you'll have to elaborate.
Maybe most of us are.
Could have walked halfway around the globe in the time it's taken to get to that point. Would be able to do the entire circumference a couple of times over before he realises the significance.Finally, we got there. Yes you can't keep the same distances, you have to multiply them by a massive factor to make the world into a disc. We don't live on a disc and that is why no flat earth believer has produced a working map.
We absolutely 100% do not live on a spinning globe, in my opinion, and I've never championed any disc so that leaves both out.Finally, we got there. Yes you can't keep the same distances, you have to multiply them by a massive factor to make the world into a disc. We don't live on a disc and that is why no flat earth believer has produced a working map.
Of course I'm asked to turn a globe flat.Nobody's asking you to turn a globe flat. They're asking you how it's possible that these cities are the verified distance from each other if the world is cell-shaped.
Nothing to do with globes or sphere shapes, just purely to do with your "cell shape" and how the distances between cities relates to it.
I don't know what that means. Is that like Eric Cantona's seagulls nonsense? That is your only counter to the question about every single person in every space programme being a sworn liar??Hollywood sends actors home after selling us their fiction and do you think those actors are sworn to secrecy?
How many main actors are there and how many extras?I don't know what that means. Is that like Eric Cantona's seagulls nonsense? That is your only counter to the question about every single person in every space programme being a sworn liar??
You're not being asked to turn a globe flat. I suggested a way to do it, as have several others.We absolutely 100% do not live on a spinning globe, in my opinion, and I've never championed any disc so that leaves both out.
Of course I'm asked to turn a globe flat.
And my response is, how are the distances worked out based on a globe?
It is easy to do but still requires tweaking.You're not being asked to turn a globe flat. I suggested a way to do it, as have several others.
A strip of paper representing the distance between London and 3 or 4 cities on various continents. Then strips of paper to scale between each of those other cities. You'd only need a dozen strips of paper each cut to scale to represent the distance. If you are correct your sheets of paper would all lie flat.
Fairly easy to do.
What part requires tweaking ?It is easy to do but still requires tweaking.
The turning your globe into circular, obviously.What part requires tweaking ?
That isn't what's being suggested here.The turning your globe into circular, obviously.
Put your globe up and show the distances and also explain how they were calculated.That isn't what's being suggested here.
This is using strips of paper to represet distances between places. When you're done, if you're correct you'll have a web of paper lying flat.
You said you accepted the distances. You also said they'd work on a 2D map as well.Put your globe up and show the distances and also explain how they were calculated.
Because he is full of shite.You said you accepted the distances. You also said they'd work on a 2D map as well.
Why are you suspicious of them now?
I said they would work on a map that was tweaked.You said you accepted the distances. You also said they'd work on a 2D map as well.
Why are you suspicious of them now?
I said they would work on a map that was tweaked.
How about you explain how your globe was mapped to become a globe?