The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Smashed up bits of a gobstopper?But what is your definition of a molecule?
Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smashed up bits of a gobstopper?But what is your definition of a molecule?
Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread.
No, I don't remember saying that.Remember when you said not all right angles are 90°, or the denial of a field of vision. Must have something up your sleeve
You can observe the effects of the vortex all around us in various ways.What would you use to detect the vortex, and rule out that it is not something else? Describe and experiment. Have you done an experiment or have you just made this up?
I just offered it.But what is your definition of a molecule?
Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread.
How did you arrive at this definition?No, I don't remember saying that.
Maybe pay more attention.
You can observe the effects of the vortex all around us in various ways.
From Foucault's pendulum to tornadoes to mild swirling winds all due to pressure changes from the setup.
So many ways.
I just offered it.
Am confused (as usual)No, I don't remember saying that.
Maybe pay more attention.
You can observe the effects of the vortex all around us in various ways.
From Foucault's pendulum to tornadoes to mild swirling winds all due to pressure changes from the setup.
So many ways.
I just offered it.
My years of doing the jigsaw puzzle of what Earth potentially is.How did you arrive at this definition?
No.Am confused (as usual)
Are you saying your vortex is our equivalent of gravity![]()
You mean when you read Rowbotham in 2013?My years of doing the jigsaw puzzle of what Earth potentially is.
I already know what it isn't.
No.You mean when you read Rowbotham in 2013?
Do you find that many people agree with you on that flat earth forum? When i skimmed through your posts it looks like you're generally having the same arguments on there as you do on here.
Except it is. All theories start out that way, or they wouldn’t be theories, they’d be factsnope
But they also back theories up with experiments etc which can then be verified or dismissed by othersExcept it is. All theories start out that way, or they wouldn’t be theories, they’d be facts
no theory in what your proposingExcept it is. All theories start out that way, or they wouldn’t be theories, they’d be facts
It answers a lot of the questions from the globies about the sun and moon.no theory in what your proposing
the experiment is happening daily, seasonally and yearly. I've explained it, you might not accept it yet, but soon you'll understandBut they also back theories up with experiments etc which can then be verified or dismissed by others![]()
Which questions?It answers a lot of the questions from the globies about the sun and moon
I understand how it works perfectly on a globeIt answers a lot of the questions from the globies about the sun and moon.
You're welcome
the experiment is happening daily, seasonally and yearly. I've explained it, you might not accept it yet, but soon you'll understand
Yeah a "globe"I understand how it works perfectly on a globe
Your theory will just stay that way![]()
How does an eclipse work? How come the light isn't seen all over when its flat etc...Which questions?
Some of their arguements fall shortYeah a "globe"
to be honest, I dont for a second think the flat earth is even remotely close reality. I just think some of their arguments fall short, and this theory is miles better than what they spout out
How does an eclipse work? How come the light isn't seen all over when its flat etc...
How does an eclipse work? How come the light isn't seen all over when its flat etc...