• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

In your opinion, which is spectacularly wrong as far as I'm concerned. But we'll leave it at that because it'll be in danger of becoming a teet for tat again, so carry on if you wish but I won't be joining in.
Not a matter of opinion, you tried to use perspective to explain why Polaris gets lower in the sky as you head south.

Oh and it's tit
 

Just some general observations.

Nuke denies (apart from those bits that fit his madcap ramblings) science, history, the scope covers most aspects of accepted learning. Yet he challenges nothing that has any personal consequences. For example he accepts what medical staff give him in terms of treatment surely he could invent some safer alternatives.

He doesn’t seem to want to investigate this incredible conspiracy. There must be lots of proof to be had, could he not wander down to Jodrell Bank to see if it’s a cardboard cutout.

Lastly why is he on here at all? I would rather be on a forum where there was a at least a bit of respect for my opinions.

Apart from vaccines which he also thinks are conspiracies
 
Not at all. As strong as ever if not stronger as I go.
The global story falls to bits and offers nothing for reality so My theories about an alternative to it hold strong for me.
Only when you ignore facts like distances, travel times, etc. Your theory is like a sandcastle being washed away by wave after wave of facts.
You agreed that you thought Australia and South Africa were on opposite sides of the centre of your dreamworld but flight times and routes blow that away no problem. Strong as fuck :lol: :lol: :lol:
Amazing that someone living in such a bubble can't see it as being spherical.
Water doesn't curve, therefore bubbles can't exist.
 
Only when you ignore facts like distances, travel times, etc.
I'm not ignoring distances and travel times.
I'm asking for proof they work based on a globe reality or something else.
Your theory is like a sandcastle being washed away by wave after wave of facts.
To be fair nobody's washed away any of my theories.
They've offered what they think but that's it.
I'd say my sandcastle not only holds back the water but gets stronger as it's hit.

You agreed that you thought Australia and South Africa were on opposite sides of the centre of your dreamworld but flight times and routes blow that away no problem. Strong as fuck :lol: :lol: :lol:
Opposite each other. I never mentioned the opposite side of the centre.
 
I'm not ignoring distances and travel times.
I'm asking for proof they work based on a globe reality or something else.
Have a look at flight times on a ticket website (your own research) They'll prove impossible on anything other than the real world.
To be fair nobody's washed away any of my theories.
They've offered what they think but that's it.
I'd say my sandcastle not only holds back the water but gets stronger as it's hit.
Then you're consistently wrong.
 
Have a look at flight times on a ticket website (your own research) They'll prove impossible on anything other than the real world.
There's a lot more to it than flight times.
Have a look at flight times on a ticket website (your own research) They'll prove impossible on anything other than the real world.

Then you're consistently wrong.
Maybe but I'll offer that back to you.
 
Back
Top