• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

DaveH said:
It is the distances between cities I was talking about. Perhaps I didn’t explain it well. Small marble sized balls to represent each city. Use scaled accepted and well measured distances between them as the connecting poles. The structure will not lie flat.
Click to expand...
Good luck with him understanding that one.
 

Nukehasslefan said:
Do you know what it is in terms of you actually knowing?

Again you're offering it based entirely on a globe and accepted distances based entirely on a globe, so basing what you say on that then it's pretty obvious it can be said to be whatever is offered in theory. However, in practice, we have no way of knowing based on that.
Click to expand...
We measure these distance every day. I’m not offering a globe and it is not a globe mindset. These are the distances between cities. Put them in a 3d scaled structure and a globe just happens.

Are you saying the reported distances between cities are all wrong?
 
DaveH said:
More importantly, how does it stay up?
Click to expand...
That depends on what it is.
DaveH said:
It never comes down to refuel,
Click to expand...
How do you know this?
It seems you have to be offered a tracker rather than actually seeing this supposed ISS.
One time it was impossible to catch due to this 16-times-a-day apparent orbit around a supposed globe or 18,000 mph and we think we can comprehend that because it's been whacked into our heads to become an accepted speed and also a widespread "yep I've seen it and this is what it looks like" mindset.

Forgive me if I don't buy into it.

DaveH said:
the aerodynamics are all wrong and it doesn’t have aerofoil wings. It is there whizzing around the sky fast and efficiently with an entirely new form of propulsion and fuel we could really make use of.
Click to expand...
The aerodynamics are all wrong because the ISS is an effigy offered to us. What is up there is anyone's guess who doesn't accept a big numb-looking thing with big so-called solar panels on it and all the rest of the junk.
It looks very good as a model in a studio which is what it is to be.

What goes on inside is merely CGI and the compartments are simply in a big building.
But then again that's just my opinion and feel free to go with whatever you feel about my opinion.

DaveH said:
Why did the team who invented it say “lets keep this from the masses and decide to make a fake space station for a laugh”?
Click to expand...
It adds to the space fantasy.
DaveH said:
We measure these distance every day. I’m not offering a globe and it is not a globe mindset. These are the distances between cities. Put them in a 3d scaled structure and a globe just happens.

Are you saying the reported distances between cities are all wrong?
Click to expand...
No, I'm saying they're not external global distances.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
That depends on what it is.

How do you know this?
It seems you have to be offered a tracker rather than actually seeing this supposed ISS.
One time it was impossible to catch due to this 16-times-a-day apparent orbit around a supposed globe or 18,000 mph and we think we can comprehend that because it's been whacked into our heads to become an accepted speed and also a widespread "yep I've seen it and this is what it looks like" mindset.

Forgive me if I don't buy into it.


The aerodynamics are all wrong because the ISS is an effigy offered to us. What is up there is anyone's guess who doesn't accept a big numb-looking thing with big so-called solar panels on it and all the rest of the junk.
It looks very good as a model in a studio which is what it is to be.

What goes on inside is merely CGI and the compartments are simply in a big building.
But then again that's just my opinion and feel free to go with whatever you feel about my opinion.


It adds to the space fantasy.

No, I'm saying they're not external global distances.
Click to expand...
If it's all fake then why hasn't America's sworn enemy Putin spilled the beans?

He could take down NASA, the pride of the USA, at a stroke.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
That depends on how you view governments and leaders.
A sworn enemy but international space stations and Americans supposedly hitching a ride on an old Soyuz effigy and so on and so on.
Spill what beans and by who?

How?
Click to expand...
Pure back foot deflection.

My questions are perfectly clear and your confused response is expectedly disingenuous.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
That depends on what it is.

How do you know this?
It seems you have to be offered a tracker rather than actually seeing this supposed ISS.
One time it was impossible to catch due to this 16-times-a-day apparent orbit around a supposed globe or 18,000 mph and we think we can comprehend that because it's been whacked into our heads to become an accepted speed and also a widespread "yep I've seen it and this is what it looks like" mindset.

Forgive me if I don't buy into it.


The aerodynamics are all wrong because the ISS is an effigy offered to us. What is up there is anyone's guess who doesn't accept a big numb-looking thing with big so-called solar panels on it and all the rest of the junk.
It looks very good as a model in a studio which is what it is to be.

What goes on inside is merely CGI and the compartments are simply in a big building.
But then again that's just my opinion and feel free to go with whatever you feel about my opinion.


It adds to the space fantasy.

No, I'm saying they're not external global distances.
Click to expand...
What does “external globe distances” mean?
 
DPTT said:
What does “external globe distances” mean?
Click to expand...
It means the distances are not calculated using an external globe.
What A Waster said:
But these are distances anybody who doesn't trust maps could verify themselves.
You could drive from South Africa to India or China. You could drive round all of Europe, Africa and Asia. It's 2 thirds of the worlds land.
Click to expand...
Do you drive whilst using a global map?
Or do you drive using a flat map?
 
DPTT said:
So could you work out the distance between Perth and Sydney ?
Click to expand...
No, because even car manufacturers are in on it.
You absolutely couldn't just look at how many miles on the clock when you are in Perth then drive to Sydney and see what the display on the car now says.
The odometers are part of the cover up.

They work fine if you're just popping out to Tesco, but once you drive California to New England they start making stuff up to trick you.
 
What A Waster said:
No, because even car manufacturers are in on it.
You absolutely couldn't just look at how many miles on the clock when you are in Perth then drive to Sydney and see what the display on the car now says.
The odometers are part of the cover up.

They work fine if you're just popping out to Tesco, but once you drive California to New England they start making stuff up to trick you.
Click to expand...
it's class his level of paranoia
 
payne said:
it's class his level of paranoia
Click to expand...

Because if he trusts just one thing then there's a domino effect. If you accept, for example, the tangent and normal makes a right angle, then it opens the door for something else because if x is true then logically y and z also must be true.
Iirc in that discussion about the tangent and normal he attempted to back away quickly because the normal looked like it was at an angle of 23°, and it obviously resembled a globe, but he wasn't sure where it would lead so just came out with a bombastic claim that not all right angles are equal. Class distraction technique.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top