Put a flat earthier into space

[fyl2u]

His logic is certainly down the dustpipe

I think for him it's always margarita time.

 

[What A Waster]

The method of scientific investigation is nothing but the expression of the necessary mode of working of the human mind. It is simply the mode at which all phenomena are reasoned about, rendered precise and exact. There is no more difference, but there is just the same kind of difference, between the mental operations of a man of science and those of an ordinary person, as there is between the operations and methods of a baker or of a butcher weighing out his goods in common scales, and the operations of a chemist in performing a difficult and complex analysis by means of his balance and finely graduated weights. It is not that the action of the scales in the one case, and the balance in the other, differ in the principles of their construction or manner of working; but the beam of one is set on an infinitely finer axis than the other, and of course turns by the addition of a much smaller weight.


From We Are All Scientists. 1863

You must be logged on to see external links

Just realised when I've posted this, i forgot to add what I wanted to say.


But the style of writing is similar and i get the impression that it's this sort of stuff he's parroting.
Think he's some sort of revisionist or free thinker because he doesn't understand stuff but asks questions to the point somebody loses patience or can't be arsed explaining.

A person might say "right, I need to go and get my dinner."

A normal person would just understand what that entails and leave it at that.

This dafty though goes "what is dinner? Why are you getting it?"

It's a meal usually eaten in the middle of the day. I'm getting it because I'm hungry.

"Why are you hungry? What is hunger? Do you know?"

Being hungry means your body needs food for fuel.

"Why does your body need food for fuel?"

OH FUCK OFF

 

[DPTT]

Just realised when I've posted this, i forgot to add what I wanted to say.


But the style of writing is similar and i get the impression that it's this sort of stuff he's parroting.
Think he's some sort of revisionist or free thinker because he doesn't understand stuff but asks questions to the point somebody loses patience or can't be arsed explaining.

A person might say "right, I need to go and get my dinner."

A normal person would just understand what that entails and leave it at that.

This dafty though goes "what is dinner? Why are you getting it?"

It's a meal usually eaten in the middle of the day. I'm getting it because I'm hungry.

"Why are you hungry? What is hunger? Do you know?"

Being hungry means your body needs food for fuel.

"Why does your body need food for fuel?"

OH FUCK OFF

 

[Nukehasslefan]

We don’t appeal to authority as you keep on saying. Some are intelligent enough for have the resources at hand to be able to verify for themselves what has been said and have put them on here, again you dismiss.

Ok, then how many of you know the Earth is a globe from your very own findings?

I still find your water level statement laughable, not once have you gone into any detail of said statement.

Water finding its own level may be laughable to you but it's right there for all to see. It's observable, testable, and repeatable.

Your ideas are fascinating but will forever be in the sci-fi section of the library matey

I agree. Until I can offer facts then it would indeed have to take place on a shelf away from real provable facts. But then again I've never offered anything other than that with my alternate Earth.

Anyone can put forward their view/theory. For it to become accepted it has to be examined and tested by others.

Who examined and tested the Higgs Boson?

Questioning is to be encouraged.

I agree.

Fanatical dismissal of all that's accepted (simply because it is accepted)is not.

That depends on what's being dismissed and why.

Why is one layer more dense than the other?

The makeup.
The resistance.

 

[BigPete]

Who examined and tested the Higgs Boson?

Canny few people work at CERN

Actual scientists as well

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Try to explain this in terms of a naturally occurring projector...

Logon or register to see this image

...paying particular attention to showing how/why the stars to the right curve the opposite way to the ones on the left.

You could easily learn to do this and verify it for yourself if the truth mattered to you more than your Faith.

You must be logged on to see external links

More info on there than you'll ever need, more than you'll probably care to look at, but there you go.

Mirror images.

Given you seem so definitively certain about almost everything you post, this is an interesting titbit about accepting there are some things you don't yet understand.

Can you share what they are?

If I was definitively certain I would be offering facts. I do not offer facts.
There's a lot I don't understand about a lot of things in life and I'll never understand the majority of things in life in the small amount of time I have in this Earth.
That goes for everyone.

Just realised when I've posted this, i forgot to add what I wanted to say.


But the style of writing is similar and i get the impression that it's this sort of stuff he's parroting.
Think he's some sort of revisionist or free thinker because he doesn't understand stuff but asks questions to the point somebody loses patience or can't be arsed explaining.

A person might say "right, I need to go and get my dinner."

A normal person would just understand what that entails and leave it at that.

This dafty though goes "what is dinner? Why are you getting it?"

It's a meal usually eaten in the middle of the day. I'm getting it because I'm hungry.

"Why are you hungry? What is hunger? Do you know?"

Being hungry means your body needs food for fuel.

"Why does your body need food for fuel?"

OH FUCK OFF

Enjoy your dinner.

 

[Nobby]

If I was definitively certain I would be offering facts. I do not offer facts.

That's not true, you state for a fact the earth is not a globe, yet you never present your evidence for that in sufficient detail for it to be tested and repeated

 

[Nukehasslefan]

That's not true, you state for a fact the earth is not a globe, yet you never present your evidence for that in sufficient detail for it to be tested and repeated

I'm talking about my theories for my Earth setup.

 

[nahwee]

That's not true, you state for a fact the earth is not a globe, yet you never present your evidence for that in sufficient detail for it to be tested and repeated

And flat water

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Mirror images.

Oh there's a f'in big mirror up there just hanging from that dome now is there?
Try a serious answer.

 

[DaveH]

The makeup.
The resistance.

What does that mean, Alice Cooper and the French Resistance?

You claim that the air is more dense at sea levels than on a mountain top and that causes objects to fall. Low pressure high up, high pressure further down squeezes objects down from low pressure into higher pressure. And this is caused by layers of atmospheric density.

I can see a few things wrong with that, but you were asking about scientific method and you always say dig deeper. So we must ask why these layers are stacked, what is in each layer, what causes it to be in that layer and then we can look again to see if that is the case, does that explain an object falling. For now, rather than dismiss out of hand, we go with the assumption of what you said is true. Test the theory.

So why is the air more dense at sea level than on a mountain top?

Mirror images.

I don't want to be too nit picking on this, and I might be incorrect. But, traditionally a mirror has an identical but reversed image of what it is reflecting. The southern sky (or the bit that appears to rotate the other way for those who don't believe in South) looks completely different to the northern sky. Where is the mirror? Why is the mirror there and how does that mirror give a reflection of something different? Can this effect be repeated in a lab?

 

[BigPete]

Oh there's a f'in big mirror up there just hanging from that dome now is there?
Try a serious answer.

If that's the case then we can bounce a laser of it

 

[Nobby]

I'm talking about my theories for my Earth setup.

Fine how about the evidence for the earth not being a globe?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I don't want to be too nit picking on this, and I might be incorrect. But, traditionally a mirror has an identical but reversed image of what it is reflecting. The southern sky (or the bit that appears to rotate the other way for those who don't believe in South) looks completely different to the northern sky. Where is the mirror? Why is the mirror there and how does that mirror give a reflection of something different? Can this effect be repeated in a lab?

There will be no serious attempt to explain this.

 

[fyl2u]

He's ignoring me again.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Oh there's a f'in big mirror up there just hanging from that dome now is there?
Try a serious answer.

The dome is ice. Clear ice. It's the perfect mirror. It's not hanging, it's natural as I explained a good while back.
Maybe someone will help you out with that.

 

[fyl2u]

The dome is ice. Clear ice. It's the perfect mirror. It's not hanging, it's natural as I explained a good while back.
Maybe someone will help you out with that.

Maybe someone could help us work out why the mirror image doesn't even remotely resemble the thing it's supposedly reflecting?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

If that's the case then we can bounce a laser of it

Yeah but it would give an entirely asymmetrical reflection in the South. That's ok though cos there's only North

The dome is ice. Clear ice. It's the perfect mirror. It's not hanging, it's natural as I explained a good while back.
Maybe someone will help you out with that.It's not me who needs help on mirrors

 

[fyl2u]

The dome is ice. Clear ice. It's the perfect mirror. It's not hanging, it's natural as I explained a good while back.
Maybe someone will help you out with that.

And maybe someone could help us understand why a perfect mirror in the shape of a dome above us doesn't reflect anything on Earth's surface back at us?

 

[Nobby]

And maybe someone could help us understand why a perfect mirror in the shape of a dome above us doesn't reflect anything on Earth's surface back at us?

Pinpoint demagnified stacking density