• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Can someone explain this crosshair/pinpoint thing and how it proves the earth is not a globe🤷‍♂️

I’ve asked Oh Great one but he’s not answering 🥴🤔
 

He's told outright that the 8 inches per square mile calculates for a parabola.

He was first to mention the calculation and attributed it to the globe model. He was told this is not the calculation used and shown why.

Any sane person who hold ones hands up and say oh I thought different for that.
DPTT said:
Can someone explain this crosshair/pinpoint thing and how it proves the earth is not a globe🤷‍♂️

I’ve asked Oh Great one but he’s not answering 🥴🤔
Click to expand...
He does not believe in field of vision. He thinks when I'm looking at the horizon I'm looking with pinpoint vision.
 
Last edited:
payne said:
He's told outright that the 8 inches per square mile calculates for a parabola.
Click to expand...
It does not.
payne said:
He was first to mention the calculation and attributed it to the globe model. He was told this is not the calculation used and shown why.
Click to expand...
And I've said why I disagree.
payne said:
Any sane person who hold ones hands up and say oh I thought different for that.
Click to expand...
I stand by what I said. No change on my behalf.
payne said:
He does not believe in field of vision. He thinks when I'm looking at the horizon I'm looking with pinpoint vision.
Click to expand...
And you know this isn't what was said.
I have no issue with the field of vision but I'm not arguing for that and I'm also nullifying it by using pinpoint for the sole reason of showing the Earth does not have global curvature.

You know this.
 
DPTT said:
Can someone explain this crosshair/pinpoint thing and how it proves the earth is not a globe🤷‍♂️

I’ve asked Oh Great one but he’s not answering 🥴🤔
Click to expand...

I love the way that one scope can see the crosshairs in another scope.....don't think he understands telescopes (another one for the list)
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Simple drop from horizontal to vertical over distance on your globe or over a circle if you wish.

Nothing to do with a parabola. It
Click to expand...
No you are wrong.

Looks like you have been fed false info by your appeals to authority and just been repeating them. Unless of course you have verified this by observation and measurement, in which do share.

Obviously if you haven't then by your own logic you can't really rely on the argument anyway
 
Nobby said:
No you are wrong.

Looks like you have been fed false info by your appeals to authority and just been repeating them. Unless of course you have verified this by observation and measurement, in which do share.

Obviously if you haven't then by your own logic you can't really rely on the argument anyway
Click to expand...
No parabola from my side.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I never said they did and that is the reason why I use a crosshair on a scope to highlight the global indoctrinated issues.

But we're not talking about a field of vision in this case which is why crosshair and pinpoint are mentioned.

The banana proved nothing.

Nope. I'm offering a valid argument and one anyone can test for themselves. That's the beauty of it, it cannot be hidden behind a cloak like most of the global stories are.
Click to expand...
😂😂😂😂😂😂🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
taipeisafc said:
I love the way that one scope can see the crosshairs in another scope.....don't think he understands telescopes (another one for the list)
Click to expand...
Magnification also doesn't exist iirc
 
Last edited:
Nobby said:
Arguing black is white.

Suppose it's not unexpected from a man that does not accept all right angles are the same.

Can't really argue with someone that refuses to acknowledge their own fallibility
Click to expand...
It wasn't me that mentioned a parabola.
I'm using the globe or the circle and a horizontal to the vertical line to offer my side. No parabola from my side unless you think a circle is a parabola or a semi-circle is one, which in that case it's understandable why you're going on.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It wasn't me that mentioned a parabola.
I'm using the globe or the circle and a horizontal to the vertical line to offer my side. No parabola from my side unless you think a circle is a parabola or a semi-circle is one, which in that case it's understandable why you're going on.
Click to expand...
So show us your own workings out to show why 8" per mile squared proves the earth is not a globe
How did you come to this figure in relation to a globe?
 
legend7 said:
So show us your own workings out to show why 8" per mile squared proves the earth is not a globe
How did you come to this figure in relation to a globe?
Click to expand...
Not my workings. It came from the side you adhere to at first but was changed as time went on because it created massive problems when people were actually seeing things over a distance that should not have been seen.

Like anything else, if it causes issues it's basically altered to mean something else.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Not my workings. It came from the side you adhere to at first but was changed as time went on because it created massive problems when people were actually seeing things over a distance that should not have been seen.

Like anything else, if it causes issues it's basically altered to mean something else.
Click to expand...
Ah OK so you don't actually think the drop is 8" per mile squared then, pleased we cleared that up.
So what are your workings to prove the earth isn't a globe based on what we can see etc?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Not my workings. It came from the side you adhere to at first but was changed as time went on because it created massive problems when people were actually seeing things over a distance that should not have been seen.

Like anything else, if it causes issues it's basically altered to mean something else.
Click to expand...
This is how his mind works. He's a pathological liar. He's basically explaining what he has done and attributed it to everyone else.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Not my workings. It came from the side you adhere to at first but was changed as time went on because it created massive problems when people were actually seeing things over a distance that should not have been seen.

Like anything else, if it causes issues it's basically altered to mean something else.
Click to expand...
No like most of your "proofs" you introduced it
It originally came me from Rowbotham and he got it wrong.
You have just been parroting what you learned from your appeals to authority and are not confident enough in your position to admit your error
 
Nobby said:
No like most of your "proofs" you introduced it
Click to expand...
8 inches per mile squared, yes I did but it was not my workings and I never said it was.
Nobby said:
It originally came me from Rowbotham and he got it wrong.
Click to expand...
Did he really?
Nobby said:
You have just been parroting what you learned from your appeals to authority and are not confident enough in your position to admit your error
Click to expand...
Lots of stuff I use is a variation of my thinking and appeals to others. I accept this and I simply ask you to accept that this is what you go by, which is why we're debating and gaining no traction.
It comes down to each individual as to how they see any reasoning whether that's based on mainstream ideals or outside-of-the-box thinkers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top